Directions: In the following question, only Conclusion is given and statements. From this you have to take the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts and then decide which of the given statement logically follows. Conclusions: I.Some rats are dog is a possibility II.Some hamsters are cats III.Some hamsters are rats IV.All dogs are rats is a possibility

Directions: In the following question, only one Conclusion is given and five statements are given as a), b), c), d) and e. From this, you have to take the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts and then decide which of the given statement logically follows.Conclusions: All those dogs that are cats are also whitesAll the animals may be dog.Some whites are animalSome cats are animalsa) Statements : No dogs are cats. All animals are cats. No cats arewhitesb) Statements : All dogs are cats. No animals are cats. All cats arewhitesc) Statements : All dogs are cats. All animals are cats. All cats are whitesd) Statements : Some dogs are cats. Some animals are cats. All cats are whitese) Statements : All dogs are cats. Some animals are cats. Some cats are whites

In the question below are given three statements, followed by conclusions: I, II, III, IV. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.Statements: Some Cats are Rats. All bats are tables. All Rats are Bats.Conclusion:I. Some Cats are bats II. All bats are ratsIII. All tables are cats IV. All bats are cats

In the question given below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statementStatements: Some dogs are rats. Some rats are horses.Conclusions:I. Some horses are dogs.II. No horse is a rat.

Directions : The question given below comprises two statements followed by four conclusions numbered. I, II, III and IV. You have to assume both the statements are correct, even if they differ from universally known facts. Go through all the conclusions and then ignoring the universally known facts ascertain as to which of the given conclusions can logically come up from the given statements. Statements :Some panthers are rats. Some rats are fowls. Conclusions :I. Some rats are panthers. II. Some fowls are rats. III. Some fowls are panthers. IV. Some rats are both panthers and fowls.

Directions: In the following question, only one Conclusion is given and five statements are given as a), b), c), d) and e). From this, you have to take the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts and then decide which of the given statement logically follows.Conclusions:1. All Donald being Micky is a possibility.2. All Tom being Jerry is a possibility.a) Statements I: All Donald is Jerry. All Jerry is Micky. No Micky is Tom.b) Statements II: Some Donald is Jerry. No Jerry is Micky. Some Micky is Tom.c) Statements III: Some Donald is Jerry. Some Jerry is Micky. No Micky is Tom.d) Statements IV: All Donald is Jerry. No Jerry is Micky. All Micky is Tom.e) Statements V: No Jerry is Tom. Some Donald is Tom. No Micky is Donald.