Knowee
Questions
Features
Study Tools

In the question given below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statementStatements: Some dogs are rats. Some rats are horses.Conclusions:I. Some horses are dogs.II. No horse is a rat.

Question

In the question given below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statementStatements: Some dogs are rats. Some rats are horses.Conclusions:I. Some horses are dogs.II. No horse is a rat.

...expand
🧐 Not the exact question you are looking for?Go ask a question

Solution

From the given statement, we can infer the following:

  1. There is an intersection between dogs and rats, meaning some dogs are also rats.
  2. There is an intersection between rats and horses, meaning some rats are also horses.

Now, let's examine the conclusions:

I. Some horses are dogs: We cannot definitively conclude this from the given statements. While some rats are dogs and some rats are horses, there is no direct relationship stated between dogs and horses. Therefore, this conclusion does not necessarily follow.

II. No horse is a rat: This conclusion is directly contradicted by the second statement, which says that some rats are horses. Therefore, this conclusion does not follow.

So, neither conclusion I nor conclusion II logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.

This problem has been solved

Similar Questions

In the question given below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statementStatements: Some books are toys. No toy is red. Conclusions:I. Some books are red.II. Some books are not toys

In the question given below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statementStatements: Some papers are pens. Some pencils are pens. Conclusions:I. Some pens are pencils.II. Some pens are papers.

Directions : The question given below comprises two statements followed by four conclusions numbered. I, II, III and IV. You have to assume both the statements are correct, even if they differ from universally known facts. Go through all the conclusions and then ignoring the universally known facts ascertain as to which of the given conclusions can logically come up from the given statements. Statements :Some panthers are rats. Some rats are fowls. Conclusions :I. Some rats are panthers. II. Some fowls are rats. III. Some fowls are panthers. IV. Some rats are both panthers and fowls.

In the question given below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statementStatements: All fish are tortoise. No tortoise is a crocodile.Conclusions:I. No crocodile is a fish.II. No fish is a crocodile.

Directions: In the following question, only Conclusion is given and statements. From this you have to take the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts and then decide which of the given statement logically follows. Conclusions: I.Some rats are dog is a possibility II.Some hamsters are cats III.Some hamsters are rats IV.All dogs are rats is a possibilityChoices:- Statements I: Some dogs are cats. Some cats are rats. Some rats are hamsters. Statements II: All dogs are cats. Some cats are not rats. Some rats are hamsters Statements III: No dogs are cats. All rats are cats. All rats are hamsters Statements IV: All dogs are cats. Some cats are rats. All rats are hamsters

1/3

Upgrade your grade with Knowee

Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.