Relative to external recruitment, internal recruitmentMultiple Choiceis more costly.results in candidates with less relevant skills and knowledge.takes less time.provides managers a wider pool of candidates.tends to be more effective in bringing fresh ideas to the organization.
Question
Relative to external recruitment, internal recruitmentMultiple Choiceis more costly.results in candidates with less relevant skills and knowledge.takes less time.provides managers a wider pool of candidates.tends to be more effective in bringing fresh ideas to the organization.
Solution
The correct answer is "takes less time." This is because internal recruitment involves hiring from within the organization, which can be quicker as the company already knows the candidates and their capabilities.
Similar Questions
Which of the following is NOT an advantage of internal recruitment? Reduced onboarding time. Familiarity with organizational culture. Encouragement of external innovation. Lower recruitment costs.
Which of these is an advantage of external sources of recruitment? Reduced training and orientation needs. Bringing in fresh perspectives and new ideas. Shorter recruitment process. Decreased costs associated with hiring.
________ is an internal recruitment strategy whereas ________ is an external recruitment strategy.
Which of the following is not a demerit of internal sources of recruitment?a.Infightings for promotions can become overly intense and have a negative effect on the morale and performance of people who are not promotedb.Internal recruitment can be a powerful employee retention strategyc.Inbreeding and stagnation of ideasd.Heavy reliance on internal sources can perpetuate racial, gender, tribal and age composition of the workforc
What is the main difference between recruitment and selection?
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.