This counts for 50 percent of the total assessment marks for this module.You are required to submit an individual coursework critical report.Scenario and the task:In 1500 words, you need to complete the following:Imagine yourself as an internal stakeholder of a school (primary or a secondary school teacher) .You arerequired to introduce productive learning methods using core principals ofTheories of Learning.Critically evaluate the uses of each theory, the challenges you may have to face when applying these ina classroom setting and how to overcome these issues. Include the following as a proposal.1. Provide an introduction to learning theories.2. Critically discuss theories that guide teachers for better performances.3. Understand the different types of learning styles in students and teaching methods.The essay requires that you have a'good understanding' of the each of the following areas as taught inthe module:1. A thorough understanding of Educational Psychology.2. A thorough understanding of application using learning theories.3. Have a good knowledge of application of Educational Psychology.Use APA 7th edition style of referencing and in-text citations. You will need citations within the essayas well as a reference list at the end with the correct formatting.General formatting guidance• Use the 3rd person only (i.e., avoid using “I”, “we”, “us”)• 12-point font• Times New Roman/Arial• 1.5/double line spacing• APA 7 format for references and citations3• Reference list should be provided• No headings/subheadings• No bullet pointsWord count (or equivalent): 1500 words (+/-10%)This a reflection of the effort required for the assessment. Reference lists and contents of appendicesare excluded from the word count.Academic or technical terms explained:Critical analysis: The term critical analysis refers to the detailed examination and evaluation of otherpeople’s ideas, theories, and studies. The aim is to highlight both positive and negative facets of thework, using a critical thinking approach. It requires actively conceptualising, applying, analysing,synthesising, and evaluating information to arrive at a reasoned conclusion.Submission DetailsStudent Number: Please fill Date submitted: Please fillStudent Name: Please fillSubmissionDeadline:EstimatedFeedbackReturn DateSubmissionTime:Moodle/Turnitin/ICBT SIS:Any assessments submitted after the deadline will not be marked and will berecorded as a non-attempt unless you have had an extension request agreedor have approved mitigating circumstances.File Format: The assessment must be submitted as a word document and submitthrough the Turnitin submission point in Moodle as well as ICBT SIS portal.Your assessment should be titled with your:• ICBT student number, module code and assessment code4Assessment CriteriaLearning outcomes assessed1. Develop understanding of key issues related to practicing psychology in education.2. Practice critical thinking of psychological theories, evidence, and practice in the field ofeducation.3. Develop some knowledge of educational psychology work.Marking/Assessment CriteriaL5 MARKING CRITERIA95%Further to the description listed in the 75% and 85% criteria:A substantial level of engagement with relevant literature is demonstrated; important insights areoffered that are informed by critical evaluation of current research. Work extends beyond the standardor work expected at L5 and has features consistent with L6

Below is part of instructions issued to primary schools for performance of a task by learners in Grade 3.INSTRUCTIONS TO SCHOOLS1.     The task will be carried out within a duration of TWO MONTHS culminating in a “Fun Day”2.     The teacher will guide the learner to carry out every step of the task as required.3.     Core competencies and Core Values embedded in the sub-tasks will be assessed.4.     Each learner is required to build/ develop and maintain a portfolio as evidence of achievement.81 Mark(s)Which method of assessment is implied in the instructions?

Who has presented the principles of classroom assessment______________.Question 17Answera.Gibbsb.Walkkerc.Hamidid.Thomas

Assessment 1: Individual Assignment – Essay (Applied Essay)NB: This guide is a living document. The teaching team will update this guide if necessary to further support your needs towards completing the assessment.Table 1. General Assessment Details DUE DATE:                         8 September, 11:59 PM, Sydney, Australia TimeWeight to Final Grade30%Nature of AssignmentWritten Essay, maximum of 2,000 words (+/-10%), excluding the references and cover page (no minimum number of words). Everything else is counted. Learning objectivesThis assessment is underpinned by the following learning objectives, which are linked to specific subject learning outcomes:Learning objectives of this assignmentSubject Learning Outcomes (SLOs)This assignment is designed to allow you to demonstrate your knowledge, skills, and capabilities to:  The learning objectives of this assessment are linked to the following SLOs: Explain the value of organisational theories using different perspectives1. recognise several different ways of conceptualising and describing organisations and explain how these different theoretical approaches reflect only specific aspects of organisational realityApply your understanding of organisational theories to a given organisational context.2. discuss how different theorising not only reflects aspects of organisational reality but is also significant in further shaping that reality, so that theory is not separate from the 'reality' it purports to describeEvaluate the merits and limitations of organisational theories in explaining organisational phenomena

Assessment 2 - Digital Story and Paper Students are required to produce a 5 minute (4.5mins to 5.5 mins) Digital Story based on their reading and research on the topic: Deficit discourses, Virtual Schoolbags, Turn Around Pedagogies and Teaching. Whilst you do not have to cover all three concepts, you must explicitly engage at least two. The video is to be accompanied by a 1080-1320 (1200) word paper that needs to be prepared using the the pro-forma provided below. There are detailed submission notes provided on this Moodle site. Due 30th March by 11.59pm. Students are required to produce a Digital Story based on their sociological reading and research on the topic: Deficit discourses, Virtual Schoolbags, Turn Around Pedagogies and Teaching. Students are encouraged to emphasise research-based pedagogical initiatives/responses to the issues posed in the video. Adequate time should be provided, in the video, to outlining these initiatives/responses. Don’t rush this part of the video. Please note that you are asked to adopt a sociological perspective in this task and as such psychological and medical issues e.g. ADHD, ASD students, and food allergies, should be avoided. Pedagogical responses in the form of ‘Turnaround Pedagogies’ should also draw upon sociological perspectives, rather than psychological approaches. The textbook, modules and subject readings can help with this. Students are also required to write a 1200-word analysis of the theoretical concepts that they have used to inform their digital story. Your analysis should explicitly refer both to the sociological and pedagogical theory that underpins your story and to specific events depicted in your story. Markers will watch your story and first and read the paper second. Please do not ‘retell’ the events of your story. Instead you should focus on analysing those events, relating them to relevant research and theory, and demonstrating your understanding of differentiation and inclusion. Marking criteria: Understanding of the question or issue and the key concepts involved • Depth of analysis and/or critique in response to the task • Familiarity with and relevance of professional and/or research literature used to support response • Structure and organisation of response • Presentation of response according to appropriate academic and linguistic conventions Rubric For the digital story: - A highly sophisticated understanding of the concept is interwoven skillfully throughout the video. - Highly sophisticated identification and discussion of sociological issue. Strong location of specific practices within social/cultural context - A highly sophisticated and contextualised understanding of social inclusion & relevant research underpins the responses. - The video is highly sophisticated and engaging. It is creative. It features clear ideas, which are skillfully communicated For the 1200 word essay: - A highly sophisticated understanding of the concept/problem is interwoven skillfully throughout the paper. - Sophisticated academic engagement with theory, policy and practice - Uses readings from subject outline and a sophisticated range of highly relevant independent research (e.g. academic literature, policy, media). Analysis is theoretically advanced.

How have you or would you implement the learnings from this module (Project Evaluation) in your life?