Knowee
Questions
Features
Study Tools

Which of the following statements about judicial institutions are correct?Check all that apply1 pointThe advantage of regional courts is that regional human rights courts can also adjudicate international crimesAn advantage of the ad hoc model is that it allowsa situation-specific tailoring of jurisdiction and offencesThe ExtraordinaryChambers in the Courts of Cambodia is an example of a internationalized domestic court In a hybrid model, the legal basis of the court is typically formalized inan international instrument, but it is subject to domestic consent

Question

Which of the following statements about judicial institutions are correct?Check all that apply1 pointThe advantage of regional courts is that regional human rights courts can also adjudicate international crimesAn advantage of the ad hoc model is that it allowsa situation-specific tailoring of jurisdiction and offencesThe ExtraordinaryChambers in the Courts of Cambodia is an example of a internationalized domestic court In a hybrid model, the legal basis of the court is typically formalized inan international instrument, but it is subject to domestic consent

...expand
🧐 Not the exact question you are looking for?Go ask a question

Solution

The following statements about judicial institutions are correct:

  1. An advantage of the ad hoc model is that it allows a situation-specific tailoring of jurisdiction and offences. This is true because ad hoc courts are established to deal with specific situations or crimes, allowing for a more focused and tailored approach.

  2. The Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia is an example of an internationalized domestic court. This is correct as this court was established by the Cambodian government and the United Nations to try serious crimes committed during the Khmer Rouge regime, making it a domestic court with international elements.

  3. In a hybrid model, the legal basis of the court is typically formalized in an international instrument, but it is subject to domestic consent. This is accurate as hybrid courts are typically established through a combination of international and domestic law, and require the consent of the domestic government.

The statement that "The advantage of regional courts is that regional human rights courts can also adjudicate international crimes" is not necessarily correct. While regional courts can indeed adjudicate human rights abuses, they do not typically have jurisdiction over international crimes unless such jurisdiction is specifically granted by the states that created the court.

This problem has been solved

Similar Questions

Which of the following statements about judicial institutions is correct?1 point Domestic courts can try international crimes Regional human rights courts can try international crimesAll international courts and tribunals have primacy over domestic jurisdictionsHybrid courts are less effective than tribunals established by the UNSCNone of the above

How can the effectiveness of international justice be strengthened?Check all that apply1 pointBy making use of datacollected by commissions of inquiry or human rights NGOsBy setting more ambitious goals in improvinghuman security By better cooperationof States with international courtsBy increasing the protection of witnesses

Which of the following statements on different types of justice is not correct?1 pointInternational courts struggle to strike a balance between retributive justice and restorative justiceThe global vision of justice is in accordance with the local visionRestorative features in international trials are in the interest of victimsRetributive justice in international trials focuses on the defendant and the violated rules

Question 7In its 1995 'Decision on jurisdiction' rendered in the Tadić case, the ICTY Appeals Chamber established that the Tribunal had jurisdiction over war crimes committed in non-international armed conflicts. Which of the following considerations led the Chamber to make this finding?Check all that apply1 pointA range of rules and principles had developed under customary international law to govern non-international armed conflictsViolations of therules and principles governing non-international armed conflicts entailedindividual criminal responsibility under customary international lawThe Statute of the ICTY explicitly provided for individual criminalresponsibility for violations of such rules and principles concerning non-internationalarmed conflicts

n its 1995 'Decision on jurisdiction' rendered in the Tadić case, the ICTY Appeals Chamber established that the Tribunal had jurisdiction over war crimes committed in non-international armed conflicts. Which of the following considerations led the Chamber to make this finding?Check all that apply1 pointThe Statute of the ICTY explicitly provided for individual criminalresponsibility for violations of such rules and principles concerning non-internationalarmed conflictsViolations of therules and principles governing non-international armed conflicts entailedindividual criminal responsibility under customary international lawA range of rules and principles had developed under customary international law to govern non-international armed conflicts

1/1

Upgrade your grade with Knowee

Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.