n its 1995 'Decision on jurisdiction' rendered in the Tadić case, the ICTY Appeals Chamber established that the Tribunal had jurisdiction over war crimes committed in non-international armed conflicts. Which of the following considerations led the Chamber to make this finding?Check all that apply1 pointThe Statute of the ICTY explicitly provided for individual criminalresponsibility for violations of such rules and principles concerning non-internationalarmed conflictsViolations of therules and principles governing non-international armed conflicts entailedindividual criminal responsibility under customary international lawA range of rules and principles had developed under customary international law to govern non-international armed conflicts

The Tadić case was a landmark decision by the ICTY Appeals Chamber in 1995, establishing the Tribunal's jurisdiction over war crimes committed in non-international armed conflicts. The Chamber arrived at this finding based on several considerations:

1. The Statute of the ICTY explicitly provided for individual criminal responsibility for violations of rules and principles concerning non-international armed conflicts. This means that the ICTY's founding document itself recognized the Tribunal's authority to prosecute individuals for crimes committed in such conflicts.

2. Violations of the rules and principles governing non-international armed conflicts entailed individual criminal responsibility under customary international law. Customary international law refers to the legal norms and practices that have become universally accepted and practiced by states. The Chamber found that these norms and practices recognized individual criminal responsibility for war crimes committed in non-international armed conflicts.

3. A range of rules and principles had developed under customary international law to govern non-international armed conflicts. This suggests that the international community had over time developed a body of law specifically to address the unique challenges and issues arising from non-international armed conflicts.

Therefore, all of the above considerations led the Chamber to its finding that the ICTY had jurisdiction over war crimes committed in non-international armed conflicts.