1) why would you submit to the law if you think that the law is so unjust? Should this be a requirement for civil disobedience? 2) what do you think Celikates meant by ‘collective’ character in his definition of civil disobedience? 3) what do you think of Celikates’ explanation that you cannot exclude violence in the definition of civil disobedience? 4) what do you think about civil disobedience as a collective form of contestation in which the constituted powers are confronted with the constituent power?
Question
- why would you submit to the law if you think that the law is so unjust? Should this be a requirement for civil disobedience?
- what do you think Celikates meant by ‘collective’ character in his definition of civil disobedience?
- what do you think of Celikates’ explanation that you cannot exclude violence in the definition of civil disobedience?
- what do you think about civil disobedience as a collective form of contestation in which the constituted powers are confronted with the constituent power?
Solution
-
La sumisión a la ley, incluso si se considera injusta, puede ser vista como un requisito para la desobediencia civil porque permite demostrar respeto por el estado de derecho y el sistema legal en general. Esto puede ayudar a ganar simpatía y apoyo para la causa, y también puede ayudar a evitar la violencia y el caos. Sin embargo, este es un tema de debate y algunas personas pueden argumentar que no debería ser un requisito.
-
Cuando Celikates habla del carácter 'colectivo' en su definición de desobediencia civil, creo que se refiere a la idea de que la desobediencia civil no es un acto individual, sino un esfuerzo colectivo. Es un grupo de personas que se unen para desafiar una ley o política que consideran injusta.
-
En cuanto a la explicación de Celikates de que no se puede excluir la violencia en la definición de desobediencia civil, creo que es un punto de vista interesante. Tradicionalmente, la desobediencia civil se ha asociado con la protesta pacífica, pero Celikates parece sugerir que puede haber circunstancias en las que la violencia puede ser necesaria o inevitable. Esto es un tema controvertido y depende de cómo se defina la 'violencia'.
-
La desobediencia civil como una forma colectiva de impugnación en la que los poderes constituidos se enfrentan al poder constituyente es una idea poderosa. Sugiere que la desobediencia civil no es solo una forma de protesta, sino una forma de participación democrática y una forma de desafiar y cambiar el status quo.
Similar Questions
why would you submit to the law if you think that the law is so unjust? Should this be a requirement for civil disobedience?
Robin Celikates work on Civil Disobedience.
n class, we discussed four different perspectives on civil disobedience and/or our obligation to obey the law (Cohen, Rawls, Celikates, Wolff). Are any of those views consistent with your own? Why/Why not? Your answer should include an explanation of the main arguments/ideas presented by the author (or authors) whose views you decide to discuss.
principled disobedience in general as presumptively wrong because it violates political obligation, undermines the rule of law, and destabilizes society both through example, by signaling to others that anyone can disobey if they feel the urge, and in principle, by expressing disrespect for law’s authority.
pted excerpt from On the Duty of Civil Disobedienceby Henry David ThoreauThoreau wrote this influential essay in 1849 because he was disgusted with the US government’s refusal to end slavery and with its participation in the Mexican-American War.The practical reason why a majority are permitted to rule is not because they are most likely to be in the right, but because they are physically the strongest. Can there not be a government in which the majorities do not decide right and wrong, but conscience?— in which majorities decide only those questions to which the rule of expediency is applicable1? Why has every man a conscience, then? It is not desirable to cultivate a respect for the law, so much as for the right. The only obligation I have is to do at any time what I think right.________________________________________1. that is, only those issues that don’t have moral implications4Select the correct answer from the drop-down menu.Read the excerpt. Then choose the correct way to complete the sentence.Thoreau reasons in this paragraph that a man isn’t meant to blindly follow the majority’s rules because .
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.