principled disobedience in general as presumptively wrong because it violates political obligation, undermines the rule of law, and destabilizes society both through example, by signaling to others that anyone can disobey if they feel the urge, and in principle, by expressing disrespect for law’s authority.
Question
principled disobedience in general as presumptively wrong because it violates political obligation, undermines the rule of law, and destabilizes society both through example, by signaling to others that anyone can disobey if they feel the urge, and in principle, by expressing disrespect for law’s authority.
Solution 1
The text you provided seems to be a statement rather than a question. It discusses the concept of principled disobedience, stating that it is generally considered wrong because it violates political obligation, undermines the rule of law, and destabilizes society. This destabilization occurs both through example, by signaling to others that anyone can disobey if they feel the urge, and in principle, by expressing disrespect for law’s authority.
If you have a specific question related to this statement, please provide it so I can assist you further.
Solution 2
The text you provided seems to be a statement rather than a question. It discusses the concept of principled disobedience, stating that it is generally considered wrong because it violates political obligation, undermines the rule of law, and destabilizes society. This destabilization occurs both through the example it sets, signaling to others that anyone can disobey if they feel the urge, and in principle, by expressing disrespect for the law’s authority.
If you have a specific question related to this topic, please provide it so I can give a more targeted response.
Similar Questions
why would you submit to the law if you think that the law is so unjust? Should this be a requirement for civil disobedience?
To what extent should laws reflect moral values, and when, if ever, is it justifiable for individuals to disobey laws based on moral grounds?
1) why would you submit to the law if you think that the law is so unjust? Should this be a requirement for civil disobedience? 2) what do you think Celikates meant by ‘collective’ character in his definition of civil disobedience? 3) what do you think of Celikates’ explanation that you cannot exclude violence in the definition of civil disobedience? 4) what do you think about civil disobedience as a collective form of contestation in which the constituted powers are confronted with the constituent power?
Question 6Based on a number of theories, people obey laws for all of the following reasons except:1 pointThe fear of punishment.The desire for rewards.In order to act in a just and moral manner according to society’s standards.Due to a duty to act
In 1891, Irish author Oscar Wilde (1854–1900) observed, “Disobedience, in the eyes of anyone who has readhistory, is man’s original virtue. It is through disobedience that progress has been made, through disobedience andthrough rebellion.”Wilde claims that disobedience is a valuable human trait and that it promotes social progress. Write an essay thatargues your position on the extent to which Wilde’s claims are valid. Use appropriate examples from your reading,experience, or observations to support your argument.
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.