why would you submit to the law if you think that the law is so unjust? Should this be a requirement for civil disobedience?

This question touches on the complex relationship between personal beliefs, societal norms, and the rule of law. Here's a step-by-step breakdown:

1. Understanding the Law: Laws are established to maintain order and protect the rights and safety of individuals within a society. They are generally created with the intention of being just and fair, but this is not always the case.

2. Personal Beliefs vs. Societal Norms: Personal beliefs can sometimes conflict with societal norms and laws. If an individual believes a law is unjust, they may feel morally compelled to oppose it. However, this can lead to conflict and potential legal consequences.

3. Civil Disobedience: Civil disobedience is a form of protest in which individuals deliberately and publicly violate a law they believe is unjust. This can be a powerful tool for social change, but it also carries risks.

4. Submitting to the Law: Even if an individual believes a law is unjust, they may choose to submit to it to avoid these risks. This could be out of fear of punishment, a desire to maintain social harmony, or a belief in the importance of respecting the rule of law, even when it is flawed.

5. Requirement for Civil Disobedience: Whether submission to an unjust law should be a requirement for civil disobedience is a matter of debate. Some argue that civil disobedience should involve a willingness to accept the legal consequences of one's actions as a demonstration of the depth of one's conviction. Others believe that unjust laws should be resisted by any means necessary, including evasion of punishment.

In conclusion, the decision to submit to an unjust law is a deeply personal one, influenced by an individual's beliefs, values, and circumstances. Whether this should be a requirement for civil disobedience depends on one's perspective on the purpose and nature of protest.