Knowee
Questions
Features
Study Tools

Our psychological defences against evidence that contradicts our views is known as which one of the following?Question 21Select one:a.ideological immune systemb.Self-serving biasc.stereotype threatd.confirmation biase.Cottingley fairies hoax

Question

Our psychological defences against evidence that contradicts our views is known as which one of the following?Question 21Select one:a.ideological immune systemb.Self-serving biasc.stereotype threatd.confirmation biase.Cottingley fairies hoax

🧐 Not the exact question you are looking for?Go ask a question

Solution

Para responder a esta pregunta, primero debemos entender cada una de las opciones proporcionadas:

a. ideological immune system: Este término se refiere a la tendencia de las personas a resistir información que contradice sus creencias o ideologías preexistentes. Es como un "sistema inmunológico" que protege nuestras creencias de ser desafiadas.

b. Self-serving bias: Este sesgo se refiere a la tendencia de las personas a atribuir sus éxitos a factores internos y sus fracasos a factores externos. No está directamente relacionado con la resistencia a la evidencia que contradice nuestras creencias.

c. stereotype threat: Este término se refiere a la ansiedad o preocupación que una persona puede sentir cuando se enfrenta a una situación en la que podría confirmar un estereotipo negativo sobre su grupo social. No se relaciona directamente con la resistencia a la evidencia contradictoria.

d. confirmation bias: Este sesgo se refiere a la tendencia de las personas a buscar, interpretar y recordar información de manera que confirme sus creencias preexistentes, ignorando o desestimando la evidencia que las contradice.

e. Cottingley fairies hoax: Este fue un engaño famoso en el que dos niñas afirmaron haber fotografiado hadas. No está relacionado con la resistencia psicológica a la evidencia contradictoria.

Analizando las opciones, la respuesta correcta es:

d. confirmation bias

Este término describe precisamente la tendencia de las personas a resistir y rechazar la evidencia que contradice sus creencias preexistentes.

This problem has been solved

Similar Questions

Realistic conflict theory originally assumed that prejudice was primarily caused by an actual threat to one's personal welfare, but research indicates that it is more strongly triggered by ________________. Question 21Answera.a perceived threat to one's in-groupcross outb.stereotype threatcross outc.social identitycross outd.attributional distortions

In a psychological study, subjects were given statements to read that caused them to form new beliefs. Later, the subjects were told that the original statements were false. The studies report, however, that most subjects persevered in their newly acquired beliefs, even after being told that the original statements were false. This strongly suggests that humans continue to hold onto acquired beliefs even in the absence of any credible evidence to support them. Which one of the following, if true, most undermines the argument?Choices:- Regardless of the truth of what the subjects were later told, the beliefs based on the original statements were, for the most part, correct. It is unrealistic to expect people to keep track of the original basis of their beliefs, and to revise a belief when its original basis is undercut. The statements originally given to the subjects would be highly misleading even if true. Most of the subjects had acquired confirmation of their newly acquired beliefs by the time they were told that the original statements were false.

People tend to Interpret information in a way that aligns with their existing beliefs is considered, __________.Multiple ChoiceSelective exposureConfirmation biasCognitive dissonanceObjectivity

The following are reasons why we encounter fallacies or false beliefs exceptQuestion 16AnswerA.insufficient dataB.prejudiceC.profundityD.false assumptions

Which piece of evidence from the text supports the idea that confirmation bias can interfere with relationships?A. "You interpret neutral behavior as indicative of something negative." (paragraph 4)B. "In sum, people are prone to believe what they want to believe. " (paragraph 7)C. "The take-home lesson here is to set your hypothesis and look for instances to prove that you are wrong." (paragraph 8)D. "The goal is to prevent unbiased witnesses from influencing each other." (paragraph 9)

1/3

Upgrade your grade with Knowee

Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.