The statement "Algorithms produce the perimeters of discursive possibility" (Cheney-Lippold, 2017) refers to the idea that algorithms define the boundaries of what is possible in a discourse or conversation. This can be interpreted in several ways:

1. Algorithms that constitute the Twitter source code have been discussed online: This interpretation suggests that the algorithms used in platforms like Twitter shape the discourse by determining what content is shown, promoted, or hidden. However, this is a more specific interpretation and doesn't fully capture the broad implications of the statement.

2. Algorithms render the perimeters of the objects that individuals see online: This interpretation is closer to the original statement. It suggests that algorithms determine what content is visible to users, thus shaping the discourse by controlling the information that individuals can access.

3. Algorithms situate the realm of possible actions for individuals: This interpretation expands on the previous one by suggesting that algorithms not only control what information is accessible, but also what actions are possible. For example, algorithms might determine what content users can interact with, how they can interact with it, and what the consequences of those interactions are.

4. Algorithms are used to make bots and trolls that influence discourses: This interpretation suggests that algorithms can be used to create automated accounts or "bots" that can influence discourse by spreading certain messages or manipulating public opinion. While this is a possible application of algorithms, it doesn't fully capture the broad implications of the statement.

In summary, the statement "Algorithms produce the perimeters of discursive possibility" suggests that algorithms play a crucial role in shaping online discourse by determining what information is accessible and what actions are possible.

Question

The statement "Algorithms produce the perimeters of discursive possibility" (Cheney-Lippold, 2017) refers to the idea that algorithms define the boundaries of what is possible in a discourse or conversation. This can be interpreted in several ways:

1. Algorithms that constitute the Twitter source code have been discussed online: This interpretation suggests that the algorithms used in platforms like Twitter shape the discourse by determining what content is shown, promoted, or hidden. However, this is a more specific interpretation and doesn't fully capture the broad implications of the statement.

2. Algorithms render the perimeters of the objects that individuals see online: This interpretation is closer to the original statement. It suggests that algorithms determine what content is visible to users, thus shaping the discourse by controlling the information that individuals can access.

3. Algorithms situate the realm of possible actions for individuals: This interpretation expands on the previous one by suggesting that algorithms not only control what information is accessible, but also what actions are possible. For example, algorithms might determine what content users can interact with, how they can interact with it, and what the consequences of those interactions are.

4. Algorithms are used to make bots and trolls that influence discourses: This interpretation suggests that algorithms can be used to create automated accounts or "bots" that can influence discourse by spreading certain messages or manipulating public opinion. While this is a possible application of algorithms, it doesn't fully capture the broad implications of the statement.

In summary, the statement "Algorithms produce the perimeters of discursive possibility" suggests that algorithms play a crucial role in shaping online discourse by determining what information is accessible and what actions are possible.

Knowee AI · Accepted Answer

The statement "Algorithms produce the perimeters of discursive possibility" (Cheney-Lippold, 2017) refers to the idea that algorithms define the boundaries of what is possible in a discourse or conversation. This can be interpreted in several ways:

1. Algorithms that constitute the Twitter source code have been discussed online: This interpretation suggests that the algorithms used in platforms like Twitter shape the discourse by determining what content is shown, promoted, or hidden. However, this is a more specific interpretation and doesn't fully capture the broad implications of the statement.

2. Algorithms render the perimeters of the objects that individuals see online: This interpretation is closer to the original statement. It suggests that algorithms determine what content is visible to users, thus shaping the discourse by controlling the information that individuals can access.

3. Algorithms situate the realm of possible actions for individuals: This interpretation expands on the previous one by suggesting that algorithms not only control what information is accessible, but also what actions are possible. For example, algorithms might determine what content users can interact with, how they can interact with it, and what the consequences of those interactions are.

4. Algorithms are used to make bots and trolls that influence discourses: This interpretation suggests that algorithms can be used to create automated accounts or "bots" that can influence discourse by spreading certain messages or manipulating public opinion. While this is a possible application of algorithms, it doesn't fully capture the broad implications of the statement.

In summary, the statement "Algorithms produce the perimeters of discursive possibility" suggests that algorithms play a crucial role in shaping online discourse by determining what information is accessible and what actions are possible.

Question

Solution

Similar Questions

Upgrade your grade with Knowee