Knowee
Questions
Features
Study Tools

Problem 2. Let {an}n≥1 be a sequence. Prove that if {akn }n≥1 is a subsequence of {an}n≥1that converges to L ∈ R, thenlim infn→∞ an ≤ L ≤ lim supn→∞an.(Hint: As {an}n≥1 is not necessarily bounded, lim infn→∞ an and lim supn→∞an might be equal to±∞ here. However, in these cases, the proof is much easier.)

Question

Problem 2. Let {an}n≥1 be a sequence. Prove that if {akn }n≥1 is a subsequence of {an}n≥1that converges to L ∈ R, thenlim infn→∞ an ≤ L ≤ lim supn→∞an.(Hint: As {an}n≥1 is not necessarily bounded, lim infn→∞ an and lim supn→∞an might be equal to±∞ here. However, in these cases, the proof is much easier.)

🧐 Not the exact question you are looking for?Go ask a question

Solution

To prove this, we need to understand the definitions of limit superior (lim sup) and limit inferior (lim inf).

The limit superior of a sequence {an} as n approaches infinity is the smallest number L such that, for any positive number ε, there is a number N such that for all n > N, an < L + ε. In other words, beyond some point in the sequence, all terms are less than L + ε.

The limit inferior of a sequence {an} as n approaches infinity is the largest number L such that, for any positive number ε, there is a number N such that for all n > N, an > L - ε. In other words, beyond some point in the sequence, all terms are greater than L - ε.

Given that {akn} is a subsequence of {an} that converges to L, by definition of convergence, for any positive number ε, there is a number N such that for all n > N, akn is within ε of L.

Now, let's prove the two inequalities:

  1. lim inf an ≤ L:

Since {akn} is a subsequence of {an}, for any n, there exists k such that akn ≥ an. Therefore, for any ε > 0, there exists N such that for all n > N, akn > L - ε. Hence, an > L - ε for all n > N, which means L is an upper bound for the set {an: n > N}. Therefore, L ≥ lim inf an.

  1. L ≤ lim sup an:

Similarly, since {akn} is a subsequence of {an}, for any n, there exists k such that akn ≤ an. Therefore, for any ε > 0, there exists N such that for all n > N, akn < L + ε. Hence, an < L + ε for all n > N, which means L is a lower bound for the set {an: n > N}. Therefore, L ≤ lim sup an.

Therefore, we have proven that if {akn} is a subsequence of {an} that converges to L, then lim inf an ≤ L ≤ lim sup an.

This problem has been solved

Similar Questions

Let (xn) be a bounded sequence in R. Show that there exist subsequences (xnk ) and(xmk ) of (xn) such thatlimk→∞ xnk = lim sup xn and limk→∞ xmk = lim inf xn.

Let (an) and (bn) be bounded sequences, with bn̸ = 0 for all n. Consider thefour sequences(i) (an) (ii) (bn) (iii) (anbn) (iv) (an/bn)(a) Which of the sequences (i)–(iv) have convergent subsequences? Justifyyour answer. [6 marks](b) Suppose also that (an) and (bn) are monotonic. Which of the sequences(i)–(iv) must be convergent? Justify your answer.

Let (xn)n≥1 and (yn)n≥1 be bounded sequence. Prove thatlim infn→∞ (xn + yn) ≥ lim infn→∞ xn + lim infn→∞ yn

. Prove, using the ϵ − N definition oflimit, that the sequence (an) given byan = n2n − 1converges to 12 .2. Prove using the definition of limit thatthe sequence (an) given byan = 1(3n − 1)converges to 0.3. Evaluate the following limits(a) limn→∞n4 + 3n1 + n3 + n5 .(b) limn→∞3n − 13n − 3n−1(c) limn→∞√n + 1 − √n(d) limn→∞ nr4 − 1n − 2!4. Let (an) be a sequence. Show that iflimn→∞ an exists, then (an) is bounded.5. Show that the sequence (an) given byan = n2n + 1does not converge.6. Use the sandwich theorem to findlimn→∞1(3n − 1)7. (a) Let n ∈ N. Define functions f, gbyf (x) = (1 + x)nandg(x) = 1 + nxShow by induction that for all nat-ural numbers n ≥ 1 and real num-bers x ≥ −1f (x) ≥ g(x).(b) Sketch graphs f and g case for thecase n = 3.(c) Let a > 1. Show that the sequence(an) is unbounded above.(d) If |a| < 1, show that limn→∞ an = 08. Let x ∈ R. Define a sequence of partialsums by (sn) bys1 = 1s2 = 1 + xs3 = 1 + x + x2... = ...sn = 1 + x + x2 · · · + xn−1Show that (sn) converges if and only if|x| < 1. Find the limit of the sequence(sn) if x = 910 .9. Evaluate:(a) limn→∞1√n(b) limn→∞5n + (−1)n4n(c) limn→∞n34n(d) limn→∞√n√n − 2(e) limn→∞sin n + n3n3(f) limn→∞(−1)n√n1https://pennance.us1

Prove from first principles that the sequence (an) is convergent, wherean = (−1)n + n2n + 1for all n.

1/1

Upgrade your grade with Knowee

Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.