Knowee
Questions
Features
Study Tools

The police are ________ an investigation into the robbery.  working out  searching out  carrying out  making out

Question

The police are ________ an investigation into the robbery.  working out  searching out  carrying out  making out

🧐 Not the exact question you are looking for?Go ask a question

Solution

The police are carrying out an investigation into the robbery.

Similar Questions

Select the correct answerStatement:The police have arrested a suspect in connection with the robbery that took place last night.Inference:I. The police have enough evidence to prove that the arrested person committed the robbery.II. The robbery was a well-planned and organized crime.III. The police are taking steps to prevent such incidents from happening in the future.OptionsIf only II followsIf only I followsIf none of them followIf both I and III followIf both II and III follow

3. It is 11:30 pm and you are on patrol. You hear a burglary alarm and notice two unarmed men suspiciously running away from the scene. What do you do first?A. Enter the house and see what has been stolen.B. Call for backup and immediately chase after the men.C. Radio in a description of the men.D. See if there are any witnesses who can identify the suspects.

While working as a Security Guard you are patrolling the perimeter of the property. You come across an apparent crime scene. What is the FIRST thing you should do?Identify witnesses, interview them and prevent them from leavingCordon off the area, contain the scene, keep bystanders away and call for the policeChosen answerCall 911Put up caution tape, photograph the scene, draw diagrams and collect physical evidenceSUBMIT

The detective examined the crime scene __________, searching for any clues that might lead to the identity of the perpetrator.*10 points1- resolve2- affluent3- ominous4- calamitous5- meticulously6-sparse

Answer the following questions based on the scenario below: Jim and Bob attended a local bank together. Jim went into the bank and demanded money from the teller. He indicated that he had a gun on him. However, no gun was ever seen or found. Bob sat in a vehicle out front of the bank waiting for Jim. Jim obtained a large sum of money and then proceeded to the vehicle. Bob left the scene with Jim in the passenger seat of his vehicle. Jim and Bob were located in the car a short time later with the money. Both were arrested and charged with Robbery. They were taken to the police station where Bob alleged that he had no idea Jim was robbing the bank...he only thought Jim went in to use the bank machine. Bob and Jim are friends, but Bob agrees to give a statement to the policing implicating Jim in the robbery. The police later attended Jim’s home and were let into the residence by Jim’s roommate Steve. Steve was told about the investigation and he agreed to let the police in to search the residence. On the kitchen table the police located papers containing a plan to rob the bank, and Jim’s cell phone containing photos of the bank that was robbed. The police seized these items and submitted them at the trial as evidence against Jim. At the end of the trial Jim was convicted of the robbery. Prior to sentencing Jim’s lawyer gave a submission to the judge advising the financial difficulties Jim was going through, and suggested a 2 years sentence is appropriate in this situation for Jim. The crown also made a submission advising the judge of Jim’s violent history and lengthy criminal record suggesting he receive 7 years incarceration. An independent report was also prepared by probation services indicating Jim’s pass/history, and comments were given from people involved in Jim’s life. The bank teller also provided a report to the court explaining how the robbery affected her. After taking into consideration all this information the judge sentenced Jim to 7 years in jail (the maximum sentence for a second offence of robbery is 7 year). The judge was particularly harsh with Jim in order to teach him a lesson and because he had several previous robbery convictions. In what court would Jim's trial have taken place? Group of answer choices Trial in the Ontario Court of Justice with a Judge alone Trial in the Superior Court of Justice with a Judge alone Trial in the Superior Court of Justice with a Judge and Jury The accused would have elected the court either Ontario Court of Justice or Superior Court

1/2

Upgrade your grade with Knowee

Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.