Select the correct answerStatement:The police have arrested a suspect in connection with the robbery that took place last night.Inference:I. The police have enough evidence to prove that the arrested person committed the robbery.II. The robbery was a well-planned and organized crime.III. The police are taking steps to prevent such incidents from happening in the future.OptionsIf only II followsIf only I followsIf none of them followIf both I and III followIf both II and III follow

The police are ________ an investigation into the robbery.  carrying out  working out  searching out  making out

If some Cops are Robbers, and no Robbers are Thieves, which of the following statements must be false?

When the police got ............. to the bank, the suspect has already left. a) back b) in c) through d) on

Explain what may have caused the following criminal (and deviant) situation. It does not matter which theory you choose, it only matters that you properly explain the suspect's actions using the selected theory.  (3 points)Extra ContentSTEVENS POINT – On Feb. 6, 2022, around 8:30 p.m., a Stevens Point police officer attempted to stop a vehicle that had failed to stop for a stop sign and nearly struck a marked police squad.The suspect vehicle did not stop for the officer and fled in their vehicle and shut off all running lights. Officers did not pursue with lights and sirens but were able to follow the suspect by the suspect’s tire tracks in the fresh snow. Officers located the suspect vehicle several more times and each time the vehicle fled.Finally, the officers located the suspect vehicle hiding behind a business where the officers attempted to make contact with the suspect vehicle as they approached on foot. As they did this the suspect vehicle began to flee again and struck an officer with their driver’s side mirror.Officers pursued the suspect's vehicle and performed a pursuit intervention technique, disabling the vehicle in a snowbank where the suspect was taken into custody without incident.The suspect is identified as 17-year-old "Bob Smith", who is being charged with OWI (drugs), possession of hallucinogenic drugs, battery to Law Enforcement, fleeing an officer, and other traffic violations.

Answer the following questions based on the scenario below: Jim and Bob attended a local bank together. Jim went into the bank and demanded money from the teller. He indicated that he had a gun on him. However, no gun was ever seen or found. Bob sat in a vehicle out front of the bank waiting for Jim. Jim obtained a large sum of money and then proceeded to the vehicle. Bob left the scene with Jim in the passenger seat of his vehicle. Jim and Bob were located in the car a short time later with the money. Both were arrested and charged with Robbery. They were taken to the police station where Bob alleged that he had no idea Jim was robbing the bank...he only thought Jim went in to use the bank machine. Bob and Jim are friends, but Bob agrees to give a statement to the policing implicating Jim in the robbery. The police later attended Jim’s home and were let into the residence by Jim’s roommate Steve. Steve was told about the investigation and he agreed to let the police in to search the residence. On the kitchen table the police located papers containing a plan to rob the bank, and Jim’s cell phone containing photos of the bank that was robbed. The police seized these items and submitted them at the trial as evidence against Jim. At the end of the trial Jim was convicted of the robbery. Prior to sentencing Jim’s lawyer gave a submission to the judge advising the financial difficulties Jim was going through, and suggested a 2 years sentence is appropriate in this situation for Jim. The crown also made a submission advising the judge of Jim’s violent history and lengthy criminal record suggesting he receive 7 years incarceration. An independent report was also prepared by probation services indicating Jim’s pass/history, and comments were given from people involved in Jim’s life. The bank teller also provided a report to the court explaining how the robbery affected her. After taking into consideration all this information the judge sentenced Jim to 7 years in jail (the maximum sentence for a second offence of robbery is 7 year). The judge was particularly harsh with Jim in order to teach him a lesson and because he had several previous robbery convictions. In what court would Jim's trial have taken place? Group of answer choices Trial in the Ontario Court of Justice with a Judge alone Trial in the Superior Court of Justice with a Judge alone Trial in the Superior Court of Justice with a Judge and Jury The accused would have elected the court either Ontario Court of Justice or Superior Court