Nushi is a journalist filming a story about different kinds of protests across the world. One segment depicts nude protests and features a number of the protesters nude on a street. She interviews different nude protestors and the causes they're fighting for. Throughout the interview, she discusses the topic.Select all correct answers.This video violates the policy because nudity is not allowed on YouTube.This video violates the policy because Nushi didn't blur the protestors' nudity or give context about the news piece.This video doesn't violate the policy because nudity is shown with sufficient context in the form of interviews from the protestors.This video doesn't violate the policy because Nushi provided proper context and the video isn't produced for the purpose of sexual gratification.CHECKPolicy informationNudityContent that shows nudity for the purpose of sexual gratification isn't allowed on YouTube.We may allow content that includes nudity if the video has educational, documentary, scientific, or artistic context. These exceptions aren't a pass to upload sexually gratifying content. Keep in mind that we may age-restrict videos with nudity.

The video Female Genital Mutilation in the UK – A Hidden World, interviewed some women living in the UK from a culture where Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) is practiced. These women had produced a video called “The Silent Scream.”  This film was:

What was the second video on freedom of speech focused on? Multiple ChoiceThe EconomyRoe v. WadeCancel CultureChina

what is the tone of the article? The proliferation, if not the outright and calloused production of X-rated or pornographic films in the Philippine industry, has aroused the vigilance of the public against such “art” that is feared to destroy the social fiber and moral foundation of our society. As the country is submerged in utmost poverty, some factors in our society, like the makers of pornographic films, have the temerity to provide what they call a panacea – a cure for all Juan dela Cruz’s social and economic problems. Ironically, this is the medicine that weakens the patient. The kinds of films we most need nowadays are those that inspire us to face our economic and social realities. Let us not forget the reasons why we devote so much time and money in making these films. Definitely, pornographic or lewd movies do not belong to these reasons. MTRCB’s Chairman Armida Siguion-Reyna’s mouthing and defending what she calls “art” and her deliberate denial of the board’s responsibility in the formation of the youth should be lessened and should be redirected to the board’s sincere regulation and evaluation of such movies. Siguion-Reyna is destroying the reputation of the MTRCB and the honest intention of some to cleanse our films of artistic junks. These porno films should be banned because they give nothing but a pain in the groin and a temporary escape from what face us everyday – price hike, unemployment, criminalities, moral degeneration, corruption, curtailment of press freedom, etc. No matter how greatly justified, these X-rated films can never be called “art.” For how can something be an art if it destroys and shakes the very foundation of our society?

There are huts along Laguna de Bay and it seems like each hut has a videoke. A few yards away are residential areas and some home makers are getting pretty alarmed with the loud singing and boisterous laughter emanating from the huts. The housewives decided to file a complaint to the TV/radio program of Raffy Tulfo and the owners of the huts believed that what they are doing is lawful while the housewives believe they have violated the law on nuisance.Which is a fact?Select one:a.the side of the housewives are a factb.the side of the owners of the huts is a factc.both have a good argumentd.the side of the owners of the hut only has a belief

What solution was given in the article? The proliferation, if not the outright and calloused production of X-rated or pornographic films in the Philippine industry, has aroused the vigilance of the public against such “art” that is feared to destroy the social fiber and moral foundation of our society. As the country is submerged in utmost poverty, some factors in our society, like the makers of pornographic films, have the temerity to provide what they call a panacea – a cure for all Juan dela Cruz’s social and economic problems. Ironically, this is the medicine that weakens the patient. The kinds of films we most need nowadays are those that inspire us to face our economic and social realities. Let us not forget the reasons why we devote so much time and money in making these films. Definitely, pornographic or lewd movies do not belong to these reasons. MTRCB’s Chairman Armida Siguion-Reyna’s mouthing and defending what she calls “art” and her deliberate denial of the board’s responsibility in the formation of the youth should be lessened and should be redirected to the board’s sincere regulation and evaluation of such movies. Siguion-Reyna is destroying the reputation of the MTRCB and the honest intention of some to cleanse our films of artistic junks. These porno films should be banned because they give nothing but a pain in the groin and a temporary escape from what face us everyday – price hike, unemployment, criminalities, moral degeneration, corruption, curtailment of press freedom, etc. No matter how greatly justified, these X-rated films can never be called “art.” For how can something be an art if it destroys and shakes the very foundation of our society?