Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto (1971-1977) banned the printing of names of pharmaceutical companieson medicinal products in 1972. The medicines would be sold in the name of their chemicalformulae only.This step of Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto resulted inA. the medicines becoming readily available in the market.B. drugs companies closing their operations in Pakistan.C. the increased use of herbal medicines by the masses.D. medicines being sold without doctors’ prescriptions
Question
Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto (1971-1977) banned the printing of names of pharmaceutical companieson medicinal products in 1972. The medicines would be sold in the name of their chemicalformulae only.This step of Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto resulted inA. the medicines becoming readily available in the market.B. drugs companies closing their operations in Pakistan.C. the increased use of herbal medicines by the masses.D. medicines being sold without doctors’ prescriptions
Solution
The question is asking for the result of Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto's decision to ban the printing of pharmaceutical company names on medicinal products in 1972. The options provided are:
A. The medicines becoming readily available in the market. B. Drug companies closing their operations in Pakistan. C. The increased use of herbal medicines by the masses. D. Medicines being sold without doctors’ prescriptions.
However, without additional context or information, it's not possible to definitively say which of these options is the correct answer. The impact of such a policy would depend on a variety of factors, including the specific circumstances in Pakistan at the time, the reactions of pharmaceutical companies, and the behavior of consumers and healthcare providers.
If the policy led to confusion or mistrust among consumers, it could potentially result in increased use of herbal medicines (Option C) or medicines being sold without prescriptions (Option D). If pharmaceutical companies reacted negatively to the policy, it could lead to them closing their operations in Pakistan (Option B). Alternatively, if the policy was implemented effectively and led to increased competition or transparency in the market, it could potentially make medicines more readily available (Option A).
Without more information, it's not possible to say which of these outcomes occurred.
Similar Questions
Why is the legal status of e-pharmacies not clear in India?Vested interests like trade associations of brick and also there are various court cases pending pertaining to such pharmacies.The government has not yet notified any proper laws to govern such pharmacies Vested interests like trade associations of brick and mortar pharmacies do not want such pharmacies to sustain and the government has not yet notified any proper laws to govern such pharmacies Vested interests like trade associations of brick and mortar pharmacies do not want such pharmacies to sustain.There are various court cases pending pertaining to such pharmacies.
Before a company can sell a new drug, they have to ............. tests and trials to make sure it’s safe. a) conduct b) provide c) invent d) proceed
In the early years of the U.S., medical care often lacked a firm foundation in scientific knowledge, leading to treatments that:Question 9Answera.were highly effectiveb.caused more harm than benefitc.were revolutionary breakthroughsd.were exclusively herbal remedies
E-pharmacies, which operate through websites or smartphone apps on the Internet, offer medicines for sale at a discount of at least 20% when compared to traditional pharmacists, with the added convenience of home delivery of medicines to one’s doorstep. For scheduled drugs, patients can submit photographs of prescriptions while placing orders. Despite operating in India for at least four years now, the legal status of these e-pharmacies is not clear because the government is yet to notify into law draft rules that it published in 2018.The fiercest opponents of e-pharmacies are trade associations of existing pharmacists and chemists. They argue that their livelihoods are threatened by venture capital backed e-pharmacies and that jobs of thousands are on the line. Apart from these obvious arguments, these trade associations also spin imaginary tales of how e-pharmacies will open the door to drug abuse and also the sale of sub-standard or counterfeit drugs, thereby threatening public health. There is enough evidence on record to demonstrate how existing pharmacies contribute generously to drug abuse and sale of sub-standard medicine. There is no reason to suspect that e-pharmacies are going to worsen the situation in anyway.The more prudent way of looking at the entry of e-pharmacies is competition and the resultant effect it will have on lowering the price of medicine for Indian patients. Viewed from this perspective, there is virtually no doubt that e-pharmacies should be allowed to operate because the history of India’s trade associations of pharmacists is one of rampant, unabashed cartelisation that has resulted in an artificial inflation of medicine prices.This practice of two competitors colluding to fix the sale price and area of operation is called cartelisation, and is illegal under India’s Competition Act. The premise of this law is that a free market is efficient only if all sellers are competing with each other to offer the lowest price to the customer.Q.16 :-Which of the following strengthens the argument for e-pharmacies?It will lead to more research in pharmaceuticals.It will lead to an increase in competition.It will lead to more research in pharmaceuticals and It will lead to decrease in medicine prices.It will lead to decrease in medicine prices and will lead to an increase in competition.It will lead to more research in pharmaceuticals, It will lead to decrease in medicine prices and will lead to an increase in competition.
E-pharmacies, which operate through websites or smartphone apps on the Internet, offer medicines for sale at a discount of at least 20% when compared to traditional pharmacists, with the added convenience of home delivery of medicines to one’s doorstep. For scheduled drugs, patients can submit photographs of prescriptions while placing orders. Despite operating in India for at least four years now, the legal status of these e-pharmacies is not clear because the government is yet to notify into law draft rules that it published in 2018.The fiercest opponents of e-pharmacies are trade associations of existing pharmacists and chemists. They argue that their livelihoods are threatened by venture capital backed e-pharmacies and that jobs of thousands are on the line. Apart from these obvious arguments, these trade associations also spin imaginary tales of how e-pharmacies will open the door to drug abuse and also the sale of sub-standard or counterfeit drugs, thereby threatening public health. There is enough evidence on record to demonstrate how existing pharmacies contribute generously to drug abuse and sale of sub-standard medicine. There is no reason to suspect that e-pharmacies are going to worsen the situation in anyway.The more prudent way of looking at the entry of e-pharmacies is competition and the resultant effect it will have on lowering the price of medicine for Indian patients. Viewed from this perspective, there is virtually no doubt that e-pharmacies should be allowed to operate because the history of India’s trade associations of pharmacists is one of rampant, unabashed cartelisation that has resulted in an artificial inflation of medicine prices.This practice of two competitors colluding to fix the sale price and area of operation is called cartelisation, and is illegal under India’s Competition Act. The premise of this law is that a free market is efficient only if all sellers are competing with each other to offer the lowest price to the customer.Q.14 :- Why is the legal status of e-pharmacies not clear in India?Vested interests like trade associations of brick and also there are various court cases pending pertaining to such pharmacies.The government has not yet notified any proper laws to govern such pharmacies Vested interests like trade associations of brick and mortar pharmacies do not want such pharmacies to sustain and the government has not yet notified any proper laws to govern such pharmacies Vested interests like trade associations of brick and mortar pharmacies do not want such pharmacies to sustain.There are various court cases pending pertaining to such pharmacies. PreviousNext
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.