How does Wiesel reestablish his ethos in the conclusion to "The Perils of Indifference"?A.He provides an emotional image of a young boy accompanying an old man.B.He gives factual information about his life and experiences during the war.C.He reminds the audience of his experiences as a Holocaust survivor.D.He asks the audience to remember the Holocaust always.

Which example from the conclusion of "The Perils of Indifference" helps Wiesel to establish pathos?A.The emotional image of the young boy accompanying the old manB.The reminder that Wiesel is a Holocaust survivorC.The information that Wiesel was born in the Carpathian MountainsD.The quick shift away from the confrontational aspects of his speechSUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS

And so, once again, I think of the young Jewish boy from the Carpathian Mountains. He has accompanied the old man I have become throughout these years of quest and struggle. And together we walk towards the new millennium, carried by profound fear and extraordinary hope.Elie Wiesel, "The Perils of Indifference," 1999How does Wiesel persuade his audience in this passage?A.By providing an emotional imageB.By apologizing for his opinionsC.By reminding people that he is an expertD.By giving people facts about his life

What memory does Wiesel begin "The Perils of Indifference" with?A.The last time he saw his parents and sister aliveB.The day he was freed from a concentration campC.The day he was forced to enter the concentration campsD.The suffering within the concentration camps

Click to read the passages from "The Perils of Indifference" and "Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech," by Elie Wiesel. Then answer the question.What concept does Wiesel address in both of these passages?A.He describes the history of World War II.B.He explains that people will forget him, but not the Holocaust.C.He shares personal experience with human suffering and oppression.D.He shares his opinions about the Middle Ages.SUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS

Which excerpt best demonstrates Wiesel's use of rhetorical questions to conclude his argument in "The Perils of Indifference"?A.Does it mean that we have learned from the past? Does it mean that society has changed?B.And so, once again, I think of the young Jewish boy from the Carpathian Mountains. He has accompanied the old man I have become throughout these years of quest and struggle.C.Some of them so many of them could be saved.D.But this time, the world was not silent. This time, we do respond. This time, we intervene.