The strongest archaeological claims about the past (pick all that apply):Group of answer choicesAre justified by arguments that take the context of where artifacts were discovered into consideration.Are backed up by a lot of high quality evidence.Cannot be challenged by the discovery of new evidence.Fit believably with other independent evidence from site and other sites in the region.
Question
The strongest archaeological claims about the past (pick all that apply):Group of answer choicesAre justified by arguments that take the context of where artifacts were discovered into consideration.Are backed up by a lot of high quality evidence.Cannot be challenged by the discovery of new evidence.Fit believably with other independent evidence from site and other sites in the region.
Solution
The strongest archaeological claims about the past:
-
Are justified by arguments that take the context of where artifacts were discovered into consideration: This is true. The context of where an artifact was found can provide important clues about its use, the people who made it, and the time period in which it was made.
-
Are backed up by a lot of high quality evidence: This is also true. The more evidence there is to support a claim, and the higher the quality of that evidence, the stronger the claim is likely to be.
-
Cannot be challenged by the discovery of new evidence: This is not true. Archaeological claims can always be challenged by new evidence. In fact, the field of archaeology is constantly evolving as new discoveries are made.
-
Fit believably with other independent evidence from site and other sites in the region: This is true. If a claim fits well with other evidence from the same site, as well as evidence from other sites in the same region, it is likely to be a strong claim. This is because it suggests that the claim is not based on an isolated piece of evidence, but is instead part of a larger pattern.
Similar Questions
Which type of evidence would a historian studying an event occurring in prehistory most likely have access to?written scrollsancient gunsbone fragmentsunbroken potteryoral histories
How do historians use evidence to create historical narratives?A.They use it to introduce mythological elements in narratives.B.They use it to make modern narratives more similar to ancient oral histories.C.They use it to demonstrate that their narratives do not reflect any biases.D.They use it to ensure that their narratives accurately reflect past events.SUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS
How is historical evidence useful to a historian?A.It prevents a historian from relying on historiography.B.It can support a historian's conclusions.C.It allows a historian to think chronologically.D.It can help a historian avoid detecting bias in a source.SUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS
True or false: Oral histories sometimes provide different explanations for events in the past or describe features that do not align with archaeological interpretations of the record. This means that oral histories are not useful in any investigation of the past.Question 12Select one:TrueFalse
Finding the earliest archaeological sites are difficult because:Question 9AnswerA.They are buried under many layers of sedimentB.Not enough survey work was done to increase the chance of discovering sitesC.Archaeologists are biased in where they choose to excavateD.All of the above
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.