How is historical evidence useful to a historian?A.It prevents a historian from relying on historiography.B.It can support a historian's conclusions.C.It allows a historian to think chronologically.D.It can help a historian avoid detecting bias in a source.SUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS
Question
How is historical evidence useful to a historian?A.It prevents a historian from relying on historiography.B.It can support a historian's conclusions.C.It allows a historian to think chronologically.D.It can help a historian avoid detecting bias in a source.SUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS
Solution
Historical evidence is useful to a historian in several ways:
A. It prevents a historian from relying on historiography: Historical evidence provides primary sources that historians can analyze directly, rather than relying solely on the interpretations and conclusions of other historians (historiography).
B. It can support a historian's conclusions: By examining historical evidence, a historian can draw their own conclusions about a particular event, period, or phenomenon. This evidence can support their arguments and theories.
C. It allows a historian to think chronologically: Historical evidence often comes with dates and timelines, allowing historians to understand the sequence of events and their context.
D. It can help a historian avoid detecting bias in a source: By examining multiple pieces of historical evidence, a historian can cross-reference and corroborate information to detect and avoid potential biases in individual sources.
Similar Questions
How do historians use evidence to create historical narratives?A.They use it to introduce mythological elements in narratives.B.They use it to make modern narratives more similar to ancient oral histories.C.They use it to demonstrate that their narratives do not reflect any biases.D.They use it to ensure that their narratives accurately reflect past events.SUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS
What does corroborating sources allow a historian to do?A.Identify a research question to pursueB.Confirm his or her own biasesC.Determine whether an assertion made by one source is likely to be trueD.Show where the information he or she is using comes fromSUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS
Why do historians try to understand the historical context surrounding an event when studying it?A.It allows them to connect the event to broader historical trends.B.It helps them refute claims that their interpretations of the event are not valid.C.It helps them make generalizations about the event for a wider audience.D.It ensures that they cannot be accused of plagiarizing their sources.SUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS
Which of the following describes an advantage that secondary sources have over primary sources for historians?A.They can offer historians a firsthand interpretation of an important event.B.They can reveal to a historian exactly how people of an ancient culture lived.C.They can act as hard evidence to prove whether a society used a particular tool.D.They can provide a general summary of evidence other historians have discovered.SUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS
Corroboration is important when analyzing sources because it:A.prevents historians from plagiarizing from the sources they reference.B.helps determine the type of claims a set of sources could support.C.connects a historian's conclusions to a unique argumentative thesis.D.allows historians to confirm that a source's information is correct.SUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.