What is Foucault's critique of the 'juridical subject of the ideal contract? What does he mean by 'discontinuous forms of power that are bound up with the exercise of sovereignty'? Elaborate.
Question
What is Foucault's critique of the 'juridical subject of the ideal contract? What does he mean by 'discontinuous forms of power that are bound up with the exercise of sovereignty'? Elaborate.
Solution
Michel Foucault, a prominent French philosopher and social theorist, critiqued the concept of the 'juridical subject of the ideal contract' as it is traditionally understood in liberal political theory. The 'juridical subject' refers to the individual as a legal entity, who enters into a social contract with the state. This contract, according to traditional theory, is based on the mutual consent of both parties, with the individual surrendering some of their freedoms in exchange for protection and order from the state.
Foucault, however, argued that this model is overly simplistic and fails to account for the complex power dynamics at play within society. He suggested that power is not just something that is held and exercised by the state, but is instead a pervasive and diffuse force that operates at all levels of society. This critique is part of his broader theory of power/knowledge, which posits that power and knowledge are inextricably linked, with each shaping and reinforcing the other.
When Foucault refers to 'discontinuous forms of power that are bound up with the exercise of sovereignty', he is talking about the various ways in which power is exercised outside of the formal structures of the state. These might include social norms and expectations, disciplinary practices within institutions like schools and prisons, and the internalization of certain beliefs and behaviors by individuals. These forms of power are 'discontinuous' in the sense that they do not stem from a single source, but are instead dispersed throughout society.
In other words, Foucault's critique of the 'juridical subject of the ideal contract' is that it overlooks these more subtle and pervasive forms of power, focusing instead on the more visible and formal exercise of power by the state. His concept of 'discontinuous forms of power' is a way of highlighting these overlooked aspects of power, and of challenging the traditional understanding of the individual as a free and autonomous subject.
Similar Questions
In Discipline and Punish, What does Michel Foucault claim changed in the latter 18th and early 19th centuries in France?Group of answer choicesBy the early 19th century, physical torture had become commonplace.Nothing changed; offences against the powerful are still met with savage retribution.Public and extravagant torture largely disappeared.The way officials tortured the convicted changed.
On p. 93, Foucault writes that La Perriè re’s account of government is “multifarious”—that it points to the co-existence of “many governments in relation to which the princegoverning his state is only one particular mode. On the other hand, all thesegovernments are internal to society itself, or to the state. It is within the state that thefather governs his family, the superior governs the convent, and so on. There is thenboth a plurality of forms of government and the immanence of practices ofgovernment to the state, a multiplicity and immanence of this activity that radicallydistinguishes it from the transcendent singularity of Machiavelli’s prince.” What doesit mean to say that practices of government are “immanent to the state?” And whatabout La Perriè re’s account of government makes it so revolutionary in relation to thatof Machiavelli? In what sense was it “anti- Machiavellian?” In what sense might anaccount like that of La Perriè re provide a framework for the articulation of a liberalaccount of government? And why do you think that Machiavelli might have made acomeback as part of a broader critique of the liberal tradition that began to take shapein the early 19th century?
Read this excerpt from Federalist No. 45:The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected.2What does the excerpt suggest about Federalists?A.They preferred that most foreign-relations powers fell to the states rather than the federal government.B.They accused Anti-Federalists of backing a federal government that could easily become too powerful.C.They worried that, under the new Constitution, the legislative branch had more power than the executive branch.D.They believed the federal government should have the power to create and collect taxes.
Qual das seguintes obras de Michel Foucault aborda a temática da biopolítica? História da loucura. Arqueologia do saber. Palavras e coisas. Vigiar e punir. Ordem do discurso. Obrigatória
Whether the reign of a French monarch such as Hugh Capet or Henry I was historically consequential or relatively uneventful, its trajectory was shaped by questions of legitimacy and therefore cannot be understood without a corollary understanding of the factors that allowed the monarch to ______ his right to hold the throne.3 Mark For ReviewWhich choice completes the text with the most logical and precise word or phrase? A) reciprocate B) annotate C) buttress D) disengage
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.