1. Execution Time: A compiler takes the entire program as input and translates it into machine code at once, while an interpreter translates the program line by line.

2. Error Detection: A compiler shows all errors after the compilation process, while an interpreter stops translating the program as soon as it encounters the first error.

3. Efficiency: Programs compiled using a compiler run more efficiently than those interpreted because the compiler directly translates high-level code into machine code. On the other hand, an interpreter has to analyze each line of code every time it is executed.

4. Memory Requirement: Compiled programs generally require more memory than interpreted programs. This is because the compiler needs to store the object code (the output of the compiler) in addition to the source code.

5. Portability: Interpreted code is more portable because it can be run on any machine that has the appropriate interpreter. In contrast, compiled code is machine-specific and needs to be recompiled to run on a different machine.

Question

1. Execution Time: A compiler takes the entire program as input and translates it into machine code at once, while an interpreter translates the program line by line.

2. Error Detection: A compiler shows all errors after the compilation process, while an interpreter stops translating the program as soon as it encounters the first error.

3. Efficiency: Programs compiled using a compiler run more efficiently than those interpreted because the compiler directly translates high-level code into machine code. On the other hand, an interpreter has to analyze each line of code every time it is executed.

4. Memory Requirement: Compiled programs generally require more memory than interpreted programs. This is because the compiler needs to store the object code (the output of the compiler) in addition to the source code.

5. Portability: Interpreted code is more portable because it can be run on any machine that has the appropriate interpreter. In contrast, compiled code is machine-specific and needs to be recompiled to run on a different machine.

Knowee AI · Accepted Answer

1. Execution Time: A compiler takes the entire program as input and translates it into machine code at once, while an interpreter translates the program line by line.

2. Error Detection: A compiler shows all errors after the compilation process, while an interpreter stops translating the program as soon as it encounters the first error.

3. Efficiency: Programs compiled using a compiler run more efficiently than those interpreted because the compiler directly translates high-level code into machine code. On the other hand, an interpreter has to analyze each line of code every time it is executed.

4. Memory Requirement: Compiled programs generally require more memory than interpreted programs. This is because the compiler needs to store the object code (the output of the compiler) in addition to the source code.

5. Portability: Interpreted code is more portable because it can be run on any machine that has the appropriate interpreter. In contrast, compiled code is machine-specific and needs to be recompiled to run on a different machine.

. Write any 5 difference between compiler and interpreter.

Question

Solution

Similar Questions

Upgrade your grade with Knowee