Which one of the following is consistent with the frontier ethic?Expanding the area covered by a wildlife sanctuaryProtecting a natural area as a national parkSustainable logging of a forestTransferring ownership of forestland from private ownership to the federal governmentExtracting copper ore from mineral-rich deposit in a landscape rich in biodiversity
Question
Which one of the following is consistent with the frontier ethic?Expanding the area covered by a wildlife sanctuaryProtecting a natural area as a national parkSustainable logging of a forestTransferring ownership of forestland from private ownership to the federal governmentExtracting copper ore from mineral-rich deposit in a landscape rich in biodiversity
Solution
The frontier ethic is a perspective that values expansion and development, often at the expense of the environment. It emphasizes human dominance over nature and the right to use natural resources for human benefit.
Given this, the option that is most consistent with the frontier ethic is "Extracting copper ore from mineral-rich deposit in a landscape rich in biodiversity". This option involves exploiting natural resources for human use, which aligns with the frontier ethic's emphasis on development and human dominance over nature.
The other options involve preserving or protecting nature, or transferring ownership to entities that are likely to do so, which is not consistent with the frontier ethic.
Similar Questions
Wildlife habitat, erosion prevention, and oxygen production are just some examples of the benefits derived from ______.Multiple choice question.nonrenewable natural resourcesforestsriversfisheries
22.New approach to conservation is the establishment of: A. Sanctuaries B. Biosphere reserves C. National parks D. Reserve forests
Q1Correct | Hard | 1m 57sDirection: Read the following paragraph carefully and answer the question given below:Once surrounded and protected by vast wilderness, many of the national parks are adversely affected by activities outside their boundaries. The National Park Organic Act established the national park system and empowered the Secretary of the Interior to manage activities within the parks. Conditions outside park boundaries are not subject to regulation by the Park Service unless they involve the direct use of park resources.Several approaches to protecting the national parks from external degradation have been proposed, such as one focusing on enacting federal legislation granting the National Park Service broader powers over lands adjacent to the national parks. Legislation addressing external threats to the national parks twice passed the House of Representatives but died without action in the Senate. Also brought to the table as a possible remedy is giving the states bordering the parks a significant and meaningful role in developing federal park management policy.Because the livelihood of many citizens is linked to the management of national parks, local politicians often encourage state involvement in federal planning. But, state legislatures have not always addressed the fundamental policy issues of whether states should protect park wildlife.Timber harvesting, ranching and energy exploration compete with wildlife within the local ecosystem. Priorities among different land uses are not generally established by current legislation. Additionally, often no mechanism exists to coordinate planning by the state environmental regulatory agencies. These factors limit the impact of legislation aimed at protecting park wildlife and the larger park ecosystem.Even if these deficiencies can be overcome, state participation must be consistent with existing federal legislation. States lack jurisdiction within national parks themselves, and therefore state solutions cannot reach activities inside the parks, thus limiting state action to the land adjacent to the national parks. Under the supremacy clause, federal laws and regulations supersede state action if state law conflicts with federal legislation, if Congress precludes local regulation, or if federal regulation is so pervasive that no room remains for state control. Assuming that federal regulations leave open the possibility of state control, state participation in policy making must be harmonized with existing federal legislation.The residents of states bordering national parks are affected by park management policies. They in turn affect the success of those policies. This interrelationship must be considered in responding to the external threats problem. Local participation is necessary in deciding how to protect park wildlife. Local interests should not, however, dictate national policy, nor should they be used as a pretext to ignore the threats to park regions. What is the main purpose of the author in writing the passage? a.Argue that rampant timber harvesting is degrading national parks. b.Describe a plan of action to resolve an issue. c.Discuss different approaches to dealing with a problem. d.Suggest that local participation is necessary to solve the problem described. e.To assert that national parks are adversely affected by activities outside their boundaries.
Which one of the following is a non-renewable resource ?(1) Wildlife(2) Water(3) Mineral deposits(4) Forest
Which of the following is an example of reclamation?Aclearing dense forests to build new communitiesBimproving the safety of miningCdiverting water to reclaim submerged land or wetlandsDurban development
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.