Taking into account Article 31 of the Rome Statute, which of the following arguments cannot be regarded as an effective defence?1 pointThe accused suffered from mental disease that destroyed his/her control over the conduct to conform to the requirements of the lawThe accused acted pursuant to his/her official capacityThe accused acted under duressThe accused was under eighteen years of age when he/she command the crime

Article 31 of the Rome Statute includes the grounds for excluding responsibility. Which of the following statements about this article is correct?1 pointOnly the grounds for excluding criminal responsibility mentioned in Article 31, may be considered by the CourtThe accused, who was drunk (voluntarily) when he committed the crime, cannot be held criminally accountable, as he was unable to appreciate the unlawfulness and nature of his conductThe Judges decide on the applicability of the grounds for excluding criminal responsibility to the case before it

Which of the following acts is a crime under the Rome Statute of the ICC?1 pointRecruiting children under the age of fifteen with, or without their consent Recruiting children under the age of 18 with their consentRecruiting children under the age of 18 without their consent

ccording to Article 28 of the Rome Statute, in which of the followingsituations could a commander or superior incur superior responsibility forcrimes committed by his subordinates?Check all that apply.1 pointHe aided his subordinates in the commission of crimesHe did not punish his subordinates for crimes that he knew they had committedHe was informed that crimes were being perpetrated by his subordinates and did not take any measures to stop themHe ordered his subordinates to commit crimes

According to Article 77 Rome Statute, which of the following forms of punishment can be imposed by judges at the ICC?Check all that apply1 pointLife imprisonmentFinesCommunity serviceImprisonment of up to 30 years

In order to make the accused not responsible for his act it must be proven that at the time of committing the prohibited act the defendant, as a result of mental disease or defect, lacked substantial capacity to conform his conduct to the requirements of the law which he has allegedly violated. This pertains to what rule?