In the conclusion, the reminder that Wiesel is a Holocaust survivor helps reestablish _____.A.pathosB.logosC.ethosD.contrastSUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS

What is Wiesel arguing in his Nobel Prize acceptance speech?A.That countries are responsible for the happiness of their own peopleB.That the survivors of the Holocaust should pass on their storiesC.That people should not simply stand by and let injustices occurD.That the struggle for freedom comes at a high costSUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS

What evidence from the text best represents the central point of Wiesel's Nobel Prize acceptance speech?A.We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.B.And then I explained to him how naive we were, that the world did know and remain silent.C.And I tell him that I have tried. That I have tried to keep memory alive, that I have tried to fight those who would forget.D.For I belong to a traumatized generation, one that experienced the abandonment and solitude of our people.

What evidence does Wiesel give to show that the United States was indifferent to the suffering of the Jews during World War II?A.The terror of KristallnachtB.The closing of AuschwitzC.The fate of the St. LouisD.The death of Wiesel's parentsSUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS

How does Wiesel begin his speech?A.By thanking the soldiers that freed him from the campsB.By recounting an experience he went through as a childC.By offering an explanation for the HolocaustD.By explaining the rage he feels about what happened to himSUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS

How does Wiesel reestablish his ethos in the conclusion to "The Perils of Indifference"?A.He provides an emotional image of a young boy accompanying an old man.B.He gives factual information about his life and experiences during the war.C.He reminds the audience of his experiences as a Holocaust survivor.D.He asks the audience to remember the Holocaust always.