The Berlin Conference of 1884-1885 aimed to regulate and legitimize the European colonization of Africa, including East Africa. What were the consequences of this conference for the region?Question 8Answera.It established clear boundaries and territories for European colonial possessions in East Africa.b.The conference had no impact on East Africa as it focused on other African regions.c.It led to the immediate colonization of East African nations.d.The conference led to the complete withdrawal of European colonial powers from East Africa.

How did the Berlin Conference affect 19th-century European imperialism in Africa?A.It forced European powers to work closely with local leaders in their African colonies.B.It led to military conflicts among European powers over unclaimed territory in Africa.C.It determined which African regions each European imperial power would control.D.It ensured that Europeans would continue to rely on Africa as a source of slave labor.SUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS

After the Industrial Revolution, how did European imperialism affect Africa?A.Arbitrarily formed boundaries caused wars between rival tribes.B.African tribes were allowed to govern themselves if they gave resources to Europeans.C.European industry and technology caused African economies to flourish.D.Countries that were not colonized developed strong alliances with one another.SUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS

Question 1Feature“It was my privilege to attend the All African People’s Conference held in Ghana. The conference was significant because it brought together the most representative gathering of African leaders ever assembled. There were about 300 delegates representing some 65 organizations coming from 28 African countries. Of the nine independent African countries only one, Sudan, was not represented.The nationalist organizations were represented by their top leadership. Therefore, whether the colonial powers like it or not, the decisions of the conference must be taken with some seriousness. The conference announced clearly that African freedom and independence are a necessity, and that the struggle to achieve independence would continue. The conference’s declaration on colonialism and imperialism significantly called upon ‘the independent African states to render maximum assistance by every means possible to the dependent peoples in their struggle.’ The final decision of the conference was to commend nonviolent methods but also to endorse other methods if they are deemed necessary.Presently, there is negligible Russian influence in Africa. Nevertheless, this influence will grow unless the problem of racism in the multi-racial areas of Africa is solved. It is my opinion that American influence will decline steadily unless the United States is much more vocal in its support of responsible movements for independence in Africa. The United States does not need to be as cautious as it currently is.”George M. Houser, president of the American Committee on Africa, a nongovernmental organization founded to support nonviolent African independence movements, report about the All African People’s Conference held in Ghana, 1958QuestionThe conference as described in the first and second paragraphs is best explained in the context of which of the following developments in the aftermath of the Second World War?ResponsesThe development of regional free-trade agreementsThe development of regional free-trade agreementsThe intensification of ethnic rivalries in AfricaThe intensification of ethnic rivalries in AfricaThe spread of industrial methods of productionThe spread of industrial methods of productionThe dissolution of European empires

Which of the following describes an important outcome of the Potsdam Conference? The Soviet Union was solely responsible for establishing new borders for Poland. The United States withdrew from the international stage and returned to isolationism. The members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) were established. The plan to divide Germany into occupation zones was finalized.

“It was my privilege to attend the All African People’s Conference held in Ghana. The conference was significant because it brought together the most representative gathering of African leaders ever assembled. There were about 300 delegates representing some 65 organizations coming from 28 African countries. Of the nine independent African countries only one, Sudan, was not represented.The nationalist organizations were represented by their top leadership. Therefore, whether the colonial powers like it or not, the decisions of the conference must be taken with some seriousness. The conference announced clearly that African freedom and independence are a necessity, and that the struggle to achieve independence would continue. The conference’s declaration on colonialism and imperialism significantly called upon ‘the independent African states to render maximum assistance by every means possible to the dependent peoples in their struggle.’ The final decision of the conference was to commend nonviolent methods but also to endorse other methods if they are deemed necessary.Presently, there is negligible Russian influence in Africa. Nevertheless, this influence will grow unless the problem of racism in the multi-racial areas of Africa is solved. It is my opinion that American influence will decline steadily unless the United States is much more vocal in its support of responsible movements for independence in Africa. The United States does not need to be as cautious as it currently is.”George M. Houser, president of the American Committee on Africa, a nongovernmental organization founded to support nonviolent African independence movements, report about the All African People’s Conference held in Ghana, 1958QuestionThe author’s opinion in the third paragraph regarding the caution that the United States was employing in supporting African independence movements is most directly explained in the context of which of the following developments in the immediate aftermath of the Second World War?ResponsesThe United States had vastly more economic and military power than its European allies.The United States had vastly more economic and military power than its European allies.The United States and the Soviet Union preferred to engage in proxy wars rather than in direct conflict.The United States and the Soviet Union preferred to engage in proxy wars rather than in direct conflict.The United States used its influence in international organizations to rally support for its policies in Third World nations.The United States used its influence in international organizations to rally support for its policies in Third World nations.The United States used its intelligence agencies to overthrow regimes in Third World nations.