PSP is equal to PPP in the condition of the:Question 2Answera. LOLP is assumed to be 0.b.No security cost is involved.c. No compensation is involved.

The question seems to be incomplete. However, based on the given options, it appears to be related to economic or financial concepts, possibly involving Power System Planning (PSP) and Purchasing Power Parity (PPP).

In general, PSP and PPP are not directly comparable as they belong to different domains (Power System Planning and Economics, respectively).

However, if we assume that PSP and PPP are used in the same context in your question (which is not standard), the condition under which they could be equal is not clear from the provided options.

Option a suggests a condition where the Loss of Load Probability (LOLP) is assumed to be zero. This is a concept from power system reliability analysis, not typically associated with PPP.

Option b suggests a condition where no security cost is involved. This could potentially relate to both power systems and economics, but it's not clear how it would make PSP equal to PPP.

Option c suggests a condition where no compensation is involved. Again, it's not clear how this would make PSP equal to PPP.

Please provide the complete question or more context for a more accurate answer.

The statement "PSP is equal to PPP in the condition of" refers to the comparison between two economic measures: Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) and Public Service Pension (PSP). However, the options provided do not seem to directly relate to these concepts.

a. LOLP (Loss of Load Probability) is a term used in power systems engineering, not directly related to PPP or PSP. b. Security cost could potentially impact both PPP and PSP, but it's not a condition where they would be equal. c. Compensation could also potentially impact both PPP and PSP, but again, it's not a condition where they would be equal.

Without more context or more relevant options, it's difficult to provide a definitive answer to this question.