Assignment overview   Title: Literature ReviewIndividual assignment Assessment type: Academic Literature review Weighting: 40% Word count (or equivalent): 1500 words, excluding references.Due date: Wednesday, 3rd April 2024, due at Midday Submission procedure:  via Turnitin, add the relevant statement from the Turnitin Links to an external site.guide.Feedback date: 2-3 weeks after submission. Referencing style: APA 7 or Harvard  Assignment explanationCritical Analysis Literature Review - up to 1500 words – excluding reference list.individual assignment 40%Due: Week 6This paper takes the form of a critical analysis of a selected topic (see below).You are required to choose a topic from the list below and then chooseone aspect or issue within the topic. This assessment word limit is 1,500words (excluding references), so your analysis must be selective.Once you have chosen an issue from the topics on the list below, you are required toread the appropriate academic literature to enable you to criticallyanalyse, compare, and make recommendations. Your paper should include a minimum of 20 academic references - this does not include websites.Choose an issue from one of the topics below a particular issue to undertake aliterature review (Note - these are topic areas below, not issues):- Job Crafting- Psychological Contract- Career Management- Mentoring TaskSee SyllabusInstructionsSee SyllabusRubricYou will be marked according to the rubric. View the rubric to support your completion of this assignment. RubricCritical Literature ReviewCritical Literature ReviewCriteria Ratings PtsThis criterion is linked to a learning outcomeIdentification of key issues6 to >4.74 PtsSuperior and comprehensive identification of the all issues.4.74 to >4.14 PtsThorough identification of most of the issues.4.14 to >3.54 PtsSatisfactory identification of the several issues.3.54 to >2.94 PtsBasic identification of the key issues and problems presented.2.94 to >0 PtsPoor comprehension and/or identification of the issues.6 ptsThis criterion is linked to a learning outcomeAnalysis and synthesisIncludes the ability to find, use and disseminate information in a digital world.20 to >15.8 PtsOutstanding development of the case with excellent details. Synthesises in-depth information from relevant sources.15.8 to >13.8 PtsLogical development of the case with thorough details. Synthesises information from relevant sources.13.8 to >11.8 PtsReasonable development of the case with adequate details. Summarises information from relevant sources.11.8 to >9.8 PtsBasic development of the case with few details. Presents information from relevant sources.9.8 to >0 PtsLittle or no development of the case with irrelevant details. Presents information from irrelevant sources.20 ptsThis criterion is linked to a learning outcomeInsights10 to >7.9 PtsCreative and original insights developed from the earlier analyses with alternative views offered showing connections among ideas and using information, theories and/or frameworks from a variety of sources.7.9 to >6.9 PtsClear insights developed from the earlier analyses showing sound evidence of understanding of ideas and information, theories and/or frameworks from different sources.6.9 to >5.9 PtsAdequate insights developed with links to previous analyses demonstrating good understanding, theories and/or frameworks of ideas and information.5.9 to >4.9 PtsBasic insights provided with opportunity to be better supported by analyses, theories and/or frameworks.4.9 to >0 PtsNo or little insights provided or shown. Poor attempt to link to analyses, theories and/or frameworks.10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a learning outcomePresentation and referencing2 to >1.58 PtsThe analysis is logically structured, easy to understand. It contains highly informative details and excellent use of referencing.1.58 to >1.38 PtsThe analysis is well structured, unambiguous. Contains informative details and very good use of referencing.1.38 to >1.18 PtsThe analysis has a clear structure, is generally unambiguous with adequate details. Good referencing.1.18 to >0.98 PtsThe analysis has an implicit structure, requires some reading between the lines, and needs editing. Adequate referencing.0.98 to >0 PtsThe analysis has an illogical or no structure and/or is difficult to understand. Few details are provided. Referencing requires significant attention.2 ptsThis criterion is linked to a learning outcomeGrammar and expression2 to >1.58 PtsUses sophisticated, expressive and appropriate language that skilfully communicates meaning to readers eloquently and is grammatically error free1.58 to >1.38 PtsUses expressive and appropriate language that competently communicates meaning to readers with clarity and fluency and is grammatically correct1.38 to >1.18 PtsUses language that generally conveys meaning to readers with clarity. Attention to detail is evident.1.18 to >0.98 PtsUses straightforward language that generally conveys meaning to readers. The language is understandable but there may be significant room for grammatical improvement.0.98 to >0 PtsUses language that sometimes impedes meaning because of errors in usage.

Due: Original was Friday 12 April 2024 23:59  now extended to Wednesday 17th April 23:59 ( equivalent to a 5 day simple extension). Note you can not apply for a further simple extension on top of this simple extension - please apply for a special consideration if needed. Length: 1800 words (excluding reference list but including in-text references ( citations), a +/-10% word count penalty buffer applies).Format: Word document only (NOT pdf) to minimise word count issues in Turnitin.Weight: 25% of your final mark for this unit of study   Task description:This essay will enable you to do weave concepts and literature from the unit and do a deep dive on only ONE diversity dimension from the modules/lectures covered from Weeks 1 to 6  for example, Gender, LGBTIQA+, CALD etc. you will need to think of also including a focus on one or two organisation to support your arguments. Organisations may be from the Australian and or global context. You will need to provide examples, evidence and data;  integrate the readings and undertake broader research from peer reviewed sources and some grey literature.1) Choose ONE diversity dimension to focus on and apply an intersectionality lens to critically evaluate the following statement:“The rise of diversity and inclusion policies in organizations have assisted a broad and diverse group of people to access all positions equally in organizations"You will need to provide a broad response to the statement and then drill down to a specific organisation (s),  evaluation must consider, how have these policies influenced the representation and progression of diverse groups, taking into account multiple intersecting social categories across various organizational roles? Based on your analysis, propose practical strategies  to break down barriers and enhance inclusion in the workplace. Support your overall discussion with empirical evidence, using the readings, any grey literature and any broader research from peer reviewed scholarship.

Assignment – STAT8061 This is an independent assignment. Each student is responsible to maintain the integrity of their own work. Sharing/Copying/Crowdsourcing will result with academic penalties. STUDENT INFORMATION Present this assignment using MS Word/PDF for the report and include the Excel file with all tabs created. Each assignment must be upload via the EConestoga portal by the due date/time. LATE SUBMISSIONS: Late penalties will be applied immediately past the deadline Late submissions received will result in the following penalties to your grade for the assessment: o 1 day late - 20% cumulative penalty o 2 days late - 40% cumulative penalty . Assignments later than two (2) calendar days will not be accepted and a grade of zero (0) will be applied Academic Integrity: This assessment must be completed individually. All assignments will be scanned to detect plagiarism and use of generative AI. -All work must be your own and must be written in your own words with sources properly cited. Sentences and paragraphs copied directly from other sources will be processed as Academic Integrity offenses for Plagiarism. -Use of Generative AI, including Co-Pilot, is not permitted in any capacity for this assessment. (*modify and specify parameters when applicable). -Students are responsible for maintaining security of their work and not sharing their work with any other students. -Conestoga’s Academic Offences Policy will be enforced Total mark out of 100. SCENARIO: 1. (15 points) Report format (Introduction to assignment, content page, raw data, answers to all questions with supporting calculation/functions etc., conclusion, proper formatting and spacing etc.). Inclusion of the supporting EXCEL file and also the WORD/PDF file containing the report. 2. Pick your own sample-data for students’ weight (lbs) from two classes (Class 1, Class 2). It is assumed that both Class1 and Class 2 contain 400 students each. a. (10 points) Guidelines for picking raw-data: i. Create continuous data between 100.99 lbs to 179.99 lbs (2nd last digit of all weights should be same as of your section number. For example for section#1 - 125.18, 167.12, 134.10 - for section#3 - 160.31, 154.39, 179.35 - and so on ii. Sample-1: size of 52 to 58 students from class-1 (400 students) iii. Sample-2: size of 46 to 50 students from class-2 (500 students) iv. Keep one-gender’s total between 30%-45% and the other’s 55%-70% in both classes. Gender ratio cannot be same for both samples. v. If you were to create this sample data (from the classes that contain 400 students each) - explain the sampling method (for sample-1 and sample-2) that you would use to create these samples. b. Include your raw data just after “content” page in your report 3. Answer the below questions in a report form. Include all relevant graphs/methods/calculation/rationale etc. in a sequence with your answers. a. (5 points) Is the mean weight of male students in both samples the same? b. (10 po

12. Format of a critical review:Ans : Intro-summary-evaluation-conclusion-references Intro-summary-critical analysis-conclusion-references Intro-summary-evaluation-conclusion-bibliography Intro-Executive summary-evaluation-conclusion-references

To read the literature critically means ____________________a.Evaluating what you read in terms of your own research questionsb.Skimming through the material because most of it is just paddingc.To suggest the previous research was always poorly conductedd.Being negative about something before you read it

Week 4 Graded Assessment Due date: 2024-05-05, 23:59 IST. Assignment not submitted 1 point Impact factor is NOT Author metric Journal metric Calculated in 2, 3 or 5 years basis helpful in journal targeting 1 point Which journal metric tracks citations of last two years CiteScore Impact Factor H5 index Article Influence 1 point Which journal metric tracks citations of last three years CiteScore Impact Factor H5 index Eigenfactor 1 point Five year based journal metric is CiteScore Impact Factor SNIP Article Influence 1 point Impact factor depends on (select more than one options, if applicable) Number of citations Number of publications Number of downloads Number of views 1 point Eigenfactor is the Journal metrics for controversial fields of research True False 1 point Review Articles are cited more than other types of articles True False 1 point Cite score covers All types of publications Only research articles Only review articles b & c both 1 point Which is the right answer regarding the following pair of metrics and their number of year's basis Eigenfactor, AI – 5 year CiteScore, SNIP, SJR – 3 year Impact Factor – 2 year All of the above 1 point Which is an indexing agency NASA SCOPUS MHRD Turnitin