Technological determinism describes theories claiming thatBloodthirsty robots will inevitably mobilize against humanity one dayTechnology is imbued with spiritual magicTechnology is the prime mover of social and cultural transformationTechnology's role is to address and solve human problemsTechnology is not as important in human development as biology or culture

Dafoe, A. (2015). On technological determinism: A typology, scope conditions, and a mechanism. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 40(6), 1047-1076.Lule, J. (2021). Globalization and media: Global village of Babel. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Andrejevic, M. (2019). Automated media. Routledge.Smith, M. R., & Marx, L. (Eds.). (1994). Does technology drive history?: The dilemma of technological determinism. Mit Press.Wyatt, S. (2008). Technological determinism is dead; long live technological determinism. The handbook of science and technology studies, 3, 165-180.Hauer, T. (2017). Technological determinism and new media. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 2(2), 239174.Postman, N. (1992). Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology.Carr, N. (2020). The shallows: What the Internet is doing to our brains. WW Norton & Company.Carr, N. (2008). Is Google making us stupid?. Teachers College Record, 110(14), 89-94.Chandler, D. (1995). Technological or media determinism.能否根据这些参考文献用英文写一段围绕技术决定论的600字文献综述？

Technology does not determine society: it embodies it. But nor does technology determine technological innovation: it uses it’ (2000a, p. 5). What is meant by this?Group of answer choicesTechnology and society are mutually constitutive, rather than one being driven by the otherThere is no relationship between technological innovation and societyTechnological determinism is the correct frameworkThe digital divide, democratisation, copyright law, and corporate monopolies are unimportant to the ways in which new media intersect with everyday life

“Philosopher-engineer Jean-Pierre Dupuy observed that science and technology have undergone an inversion of traditional anthropocentric arrogance.”In the context of the passage, which one of the following is NOT a possible implication of the quoted statement?Science and technology are no longer solely centered around human beings and their mastery over nature.Science and technology have their own emergent properties and potential risks that cannot be fully understood by humans.Science and technology may have advanced beyond the point where they can be completely controlled or mastered by their creators.Tomorrow’s engineers will be preoccupied with developing ways not only to counter the power of technology but also to mitigate its power and risks.

How can engineers contribute to the ethical use of emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence and robotics?Question 29Answera.By developing technologies without considering their potential impact on societyb.By ignoring concerns about the potential misuse of technologyc.By designing technologies with built-in safeguards and ethical considerationsd.By prioritizing profit over the ethical implications of their inventions

The study showed that contrary to Industry 4.0, Industry5.0 appears to be pulled by socio-environmental valuesand needs. Industry 5.0 is the logical continuation ofIndustry 4.0 that draws on commercially mature digitaland operations technologies and emerging disruptivetechnologies such as CAI and adaptive robots to promotehuman-centricity, resilience, and sustainable develop-ment. Industry 5.0 is expected to address the pressingsustainable development concerns by introducing circu-larity into industrial operations, enhancing synergybetween autonomous machines and humans, and regu-lating the pace and quality of digital industrialtransformation.The findings reveal that Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0share similarities but have notable differences. For exam-ple, both frameworks emphasize horizontal integration,which involves integrating different parts of the produc-tion process across the manufacturing supply chains toimprove productivity and reduce costs. Nonetheless, hor-izontal integration under Industry 5.0 goes beyond justintegrating various parts of the manufacturing value net-work. It integrates all stakeholders, including technologyproviders, labor unions, and government regulators, tocreate a seamless and collaborative network to governtechnological advancement. Another significant differ-ence between the two frameworks concerns the techno-logical focus. Although Industry 4.0 was pushed byemerging technologies such as the internet of thingsand cloud computing, these technologies are now com-monplace and considered standard in Industry 5.0.Instead, Industry 5.0 is associated with the emergence ofcognitive technologies that support human-machinesymbioses, such as artificial general intelligence, cognitivecyber-physical systems, and adaptive robots. These tech-nologies enable greater collaboration between humansand machines, and they have the potential to revolutio-nize the way we work and live. Overall, the findings implythat the critical difference between Industry 4.0 andIndustry 5.0 lies in the scope and nature of integrationand the technological properties that drive innovation442 M. GHOBAKHLOO ET AL.and economic values in each framework. While Industry4.0 is merely focused on economic performance, Industry5.0 seeks to balance triple bottom-line considerations byharnessing technology-driven productivity to enhancesocietal values.