For your Learning Community Report, you should use the Microsoft Word templateprovided on the ‘Learning Community’ section of the course website. This includes atable on page 1 that must be completed. The details in this table should be the sameas the ones provided under the ‘Learning Community Details’ link. Your final file shouldbe submitted in Microsoft Word format (not as a PDF).

All the items provided includes Teacher expected professional teaching and learning documents, excerpt? (1mark)Question 8Answera.Progress recordb.Record of the teacherc.Scheme of workd.Lesson plan

Assignment requirementsAfter participating in the careers workshop activity (Week 2) and reflective writing workshop (Week 3), students will prepare a short 500 word piece discussing their career goals and career/study aspirations and how the study of accounting may (or may not) be useful in achieving those goals. This task will be due in Week 4 based on the due date listed below.Submission template: 22108 Sp23 A2 submission template Download 22108 Sp23 A2 submission template[word doc template] Download this file, then double click on the template to create your file. Submissions that are not using the template will not be marked. If you do not have Microsoft Word on your computer, follow the instructions on this UTS website to obtain a free subscription.Due date: Tuesday 29th August at 11.59pm. Note that the due date is earlier than the "available to" date you see in Canvas - the 2nd date is the last date you can submit but it will attract a late submission penalty. Assignment structureThere is no mandatory structure - but in Workshop 3 we provided the following recommended structuredescription of your career aspirations and goals (estimate 1 paragraph)discussion of your feelings related to your goals, any external pressures, any insights that came from the careers activities and any feelings related to the study of accounting (estimate 1 long or 2 shorter paragraphs)evaluation - how does the study of accounting fit into your career goals and aspirations (estimate 1 long or 2 shorter paragraphs)conclusions - given your evaluation of the role of accounting in your career, what strategies will you employ to achieve your designed mark/grade in the subject (estimate 1 paragraph)Following the recommended structure will also help you meet the assessment criteria below.Please follow this submission template. 22108 Sp23 A2 submission template Download 22108 Sp23 A2 submission template[word doc template] Download this file, then double click on the template to create your file. Submissions that are not using the template will not be marked and 0 marks will be awarded. If you do not have Microsoft Word on your computer, follow the instructions on this UTS website to obtain a free subscription. For Stage 1, the team conducted checks to ensure each student was using the correct template and gave students a chance to re-submit without penalty. For Stage 2 - there will be no checking or follow ups - it is your responsibility to submit the format in the correct format.The word limit is 500 words for this task. We do not have a 10% over/under leeway - when set a target, students should learn to work with that target. We will accept 1-2% over the word limit. Students can be under the word limit as much as they like. Going over the word limit will result in penalties being applied. 2.01 to 5% over and there will be a 1 mark deduction, 6% or more over and there will be a 2 mark deduction.  Submission informationThere is NO COVER SHEET for the assignment. Please follow this submission template. 22108 Sp23 A2 submission template Download 22108 Sp23 A2 submission template[word doc template]. Download this file, then double click on the template to create your file. Submissions that are not using the template will not be marked. If you do not have Microsoft Word on your computer, follow the instructions on this UTS website to obtain a free subscription. Only word documents are accepted - you will not be able to submit a PDF, pages file or other format like a link to a Google Doc. If you are using Google Docs, please export it as a Word document. Academic integrityIt is imperative at UTS that students complete their work with integrity - completing your own work and referencing the contributions of others. UTS conducts regular checks and investigations into work that may breach our integrity standards - this can include plagiarism, improper paraphrasing, collusion and contract cheating (engaging another person to prepare work for you). Turnitin will be run on all submissions and you are able to view your Turnitin report. No references are required in this assessment task because we are asking you to write about your own thoughts, feelings and perceptions. If you do choose to use any outside sources, please use in-text referencing in accordance with APA 7 - refer to the UTS APA 7 Library guide for more information.By submitting your assessment task, you are certifying thatthis is your own work in your own wordsyou have appropriately recognised the work of others (if used) through appropriate APA 7 referencingthat you have not published or shared your completed work to any notes sharing sites (as this is a breach of UTS' rules related to misconduct because it is helping others cheat)that the work has not been previously submitted for assessment in this subject or any other  (if you are repeating AAA, you should write an entirely new/fresh reflection)Your assessment submission will be processed through Turnitin. Where the teaching staff have concerns about whether you have completed your own work (for example, your document has low editing time, a low version number or does not appear to be written by you for any other reason) - you may be asked to provide documentation showing the drafting process you have undertaken in reaching your final submission. This process is similar to real-world accounting, where documents showing the preparation of the financial statements, accounting advice to clients, tax advice or the audit report/opinion are commonly referred to as 'working papers' and must be produced by regulatory bodies on request. For students, your working papers for this assignment can include notes, drafts, access to cloud-stored documents in services such as Google Drive or OneDrive, or internet search history related to the assessment task. It is recommended that you retain these notes, drafts etc for at least 4 months after the end of the teaching session (businesses and accountants in Australia are required to keep their working papers for 7 years). Failure to be able to produce material on request from your coordinator, Academic Integrity Officer or Responsible Academic Officer of the university may be used in misconduct allegations against you. Any request will be made to you in writing to your UTS email address.

W12 Assignment: ReportsStart AssignmentDue Sunday by 9:59am Points 50 Submitting a text entry box, a website url, a media recording, or a file uploadOverviewTask: Create a one page visual summary of a program evaluation reportPurpose: Communicate evaluation findings to stakeholdersAssignmentHere are some examples of 1-page visual summariesLinks to an external site.. Please review prior to beginning your assignment.You will create a one-page visual summary of a program evaluation report. The target audience (stakeholders) for this summary is the local city council. Your summary should include recommendations for implementing these findings.Read this report on the Economic Cost of Injury for an evaluation of injury prevention policies in the United States.  Create a one-page visual summary of your own about the findings reported in the Economic Cost of Injury article. Make recommendations for implementing the findings. Keep in mind your target audience as you summarize the information. It may be best to use Microsoft PowerPoint as described in the videos but you can use other software if you are comfortable with it.Convert your document into PDF formatSubmit your report RubricWeek 12Week 12Criteria Ratings PtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment is in PDF format5 ptsFull Marks0 ptsNo Marks5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEconomic Cost of Injury is the topic summarized5 ptsFull Marks0 ptsNo Marks5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeNo spelling or grammar issues5 ptsFull Marks0 ptsNo Marks5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThere are at least two visual aspects to the summary10 ptsFull Marks0 ptsNo Marks10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary is in your own words5 ptsFull Marks0 ptsNo Marks5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEntire full page is used for the visual summary10 ptsFull Marks0 ptsNo Marks10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEasy to read and looks visual appealing5 ptsFull Marks0 ptsNo Marks5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe summary includes realistic recommendations for future action5 ptsFull Marks0 ptsNo Marks5 pts

All the items provided includes Teacher expected professional teaching and learning documents, excerpt? (1mark)Question 15Answera.Lesson planb.Record of the teacherc.Scheme of workd.Progress record

This counts for 50 percent of the total assessment marks for this module.You are required to submit an individual coursework critical report.Scenario and the task:In 1500 words, you need to complete the following:Imagine yourself as an internal stakeholder of a school (primary or a secondary school teacher) .You arerequired to introduce productive learning methods using core principals ofTheories of Learning.Critically evaluate the uses of each theory, the challenges you may have to face when applying these ina classroom setting and how to overcome these issues. Include the following as a proposal.1. Provide an introduction to learning theories.2. Critically discuss theories that guide teachers for better performances.3. Understand the different types of learning styles in students and teaching methods.The essay requires that you have a'good understanding' of the each of the following areas as taught inthe module:1. A thorough understanding of Educational Psychology.2. A thorough understanding of application using learning theories.3. Have a good knowledge of application of Educational Psychology.Use APA 7th edition style of referencing and in-text citations. You will need citations within the essayas well as a reference list at the end with the correct formatting.General formatting guidance• Use the 3rd person only (i.e., avoid using “I”, “we”, “us”)• 12-point font• Times New Roman/Arial• 1.5/double line spacing• APA 7 format for references and citations3• Reference list should be provided• No headings/subheadings• No bullet pointsWord count (or equivalent): 1500 words (+/-10%)This a reflection of the effort required for the assessment. Reference lists and contents of appendicesare excluded from the word count.Academic or technical terms explained:Critical analysis: The term critical analysis refers to the detailed examination and evaluation of otherpeople’s ideas, theories, and studies. The aim is to highlight both positive and negative facets of thework, using a critical thinking approach. It requires actively conceptualising, applying, analysing,synthesising, and evaluating information to arrive at a reasoned conclusion.Submission DetailsStudent Number: Please fill Date submitted: Please fillStudent Name: Please fillSubmissionDeadline:EstimatedFeedbackReturn DateSubmissionTime:Moodle/Turnitin/ICBT SIS:Any assessments submitted after the deadline will not be marked and will berecorded as a non-attempt unless you have had an extension request agreedor have approved mitigating circumstances.File Format: The assessment must be submitted as a word document and submitthrough the Turnitin submission point in Moodle as well as ICBT SIS portal.Your assessment should be titled with your:• ICBT student number, module code and assessment code4Assessment CriteriaLearning outcomes assessed1. Develop understanding of key issues related to practicing psychology in education.2. Practice critical thinking of psychological theories, evidence, and practice in the field ofeducation.3. Develop some knowledge of educational psychology work.Marking/Assessment CriteriaL5 MARKING CRITERIA95%Further to the description listed in the 75% and 85% criteria:A substantial level of engagement with relevant literature is demonstrated; important insights areoffered that are informed by critical evaluation of current research. Work extends beyond the standardor work expected at L5 and has features consistent with L6