A distribution dilemmaThe viability of Plan A started looking better as the deliveries increased per month; however, the deliveries were still significantly lower than what was achieved by Plan B, which on the onset seemed a lot more profitable. Even though Plan B looks attractive, what are the potential issues to be considered with this plan? (Note: More than one option may be correct.)A purely commission-based delivery service can suffer in terms of service quality.✕ IncorrectFooddeliver.com would have less control on the overall channel as compared to Plan A.✕ IncorrectIt would be more difficult to expand to multiple locations with Plan B.✕ Incorrect

The potential issues to be considered with Plan B could be:

1. A purely commission-based delivery service can suffer in terms of service quality: This is because the delivery personnel might prioritize quantity over quality, leading to potential issues with the service provided.

2. Fooddeliver.com would have less control over the overall channel as compared to Plan A: With Plan B, the company might have to rely on third-party delivery services, which could lead to less control over the delivery process, including timing, handling of the food, and customer service.

3. It would be more difficult to expand to multiple locations with Plan B: If Plan B relies on third-party delivery services, expansion could be limited by the availability and reach of these services. In contrast, with Plan A, the company could potentially establish its own delivery network, allowing for more flexibility in terms of expansion.