The environmental issues associated with Methane present a profound climate change risk and have significant implications from a financial perspective. Therefore the focus should not just be on CO2. One reason for this is because:  Group of answer choicesIt has a role in ensuring the resilience of natural capital assets and securing them for the futureMethane is a climate pollutant 84 times more powerful than CO2 over 20 yearsThe primary by-product of hydraulic fracturing (fracking) is methane which is far more potent than CO2

The environmental issues associated with Methane indeed present a significant risk to climate change and have substantial financial implications. Therefore, the focus should not be solely on CO2. There are several reasons for this:

1. Methane plays a role in ensuring the resilience of natural capital assets and securing them for the future. Natural capital assets refer to the earth's natural resources and the ecological systems that provide vital ecosystem services. Methane, being a potent greenhouse gas, can significantly impact these assets and their future resilience.

2. Methane is a climate pollutant 84 times more potent than CO2 over 20 years. This means that even though the quantity of methane might be less in the atmosphere compared to CO2, its impact on global warming is much more significant due to its higher global warming potential.

3. The primary by-product of hydraulic fracturing (fracking) is methane, which is far more potent than CO2. Fracking is a method used to extract natural gas from the earth, and the process releases a significant amount of methane into the atmosphere. This makes it a significant contributor to climate change.

Therefore, it is crucial to consider methane alongside CO2 when addressing environmental issues and climate change.