Which of the following is false about protected class members?They begin with one underscoreThey can be accessed by subclassesThey can be accessed by name mangling methodThey can be accessed within a class
Question
Which of the following is false about protected class members?They begin with one underscoreThey can be accessed by subclassesThey can be accessed by name mangling methodThey can be accessed within a class
Solution 1
The false statement about protected class members is: "They begin with one underscore".
In Python, protected class members begin with a single underscore, but this is more of a convention than a strict rule. It's a hint to the programmer that the member should be treated as private, but it doesn't actually prevent the member from being accessed directly.
However, in many other languages like Java or C++, protected class members don't begin with an underscore. Instead, they are declared with the keyword 'protected'.
So, the statement is not universally true for all programming languages.
Solution 2
The false statement about protected class members is: "They begin with one underscore".
In Python, protected class members begin with a single underscore, but this is more of a convention than a hard rule. It's a hint to the programmer that the member should be treated as private, but it doesn't actually prevent the member from being accessed directly.
However, in many other languages like Java or C++, protected class members don't begin with an underscore. Instead, they are declared with the keyword 'protected'.
So, the statement is not universally true for all programming languages.
Solution 3
The false statement about protected class members is: "They begin with one underscore".
In Python, protected class members begin with a single underscore, but this is more of a convention than a hard rule. It's a hint to the programmer that the member should be treated as private, but it doesn't actually prevent the member from being accessed directly.
However, in many other languages like Java or C++, protected class members don't begin with an underscore. Instead, they are declared with the keyword 'protected'.
So, the statement is not universally true for all programming languages.
Similar Questions
Which of the following statements is true regarding protected members in inheritance? (2 Points) a) Protected members can only be accessed by the derived class. b) Protected members can be accessed by any class in the same namespace. c) Protected members can be accessed by any class derived from the base class. d) Protected members can be accessed by any class in the program.
Which of the following statements are incorrect?none of themprivate members of class can be accessed from subclasspublic members of class can be accessed by any code in the programprivate members of class can only be accessed by other members of the class
A class member declared protected becomes a member of subclass of which type?Optionsprivate memberpublic memberprotected memberstatic member
Which of this access specifies can be used for a class so that its members can be accessed by a different class in the same package? b) Protecteda) Publicd) All of the mentionedc) No Modifier
Given a method in a protected class, access modifier must be used to restrict access to that method to only the other members of the same class.
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.