Complete the passage by filling in the blank(s). Drag the word(s) below to fill in the blank(s) or use your keyboard to choose word(s) from the dropdown menus.With the advent of the microchip in the 1980s, affordable personal computers and other electronics became widely available to the public. Because the Internet connected users across America and the world, investors were attracted to the idea of – being conducted over the Internet. This led to a rapid increase in – investment, creating an unsustainable bubble that burst in April 2000 and drove stock prices – for the next three years.

With the advent of the microchip in the 1980s, affordable personal computers and other electronics became widely available to the public. Because the Internet connected users across America and the world, investors were attracted to the idea of business being conducted over the Internet. This led to a rapid increase in – investment, creating an unsustainable bubble that burst in April 2000 and drove stock prices down for the next three years.green energydatingup“dot com”

In the 1970s, personal computers cost $5,000. Today they cost $800. What happened to quantity of computers demanded?

1. The first to mass-Market a Microcomputer as a personal computer wasIBMSperry UNIVACData General CorporationRadio Shack

5. This history was the rise of the internet and web applications led to increased demand for scalable and flexible databases.A. 1990sB. 1980sC. 1970sD. 2000s

Q15Incorrect  |  Medium  |  30sDirection: Read the following paragraph carefully and answer the question given below:In the decades following World War II, American business had undisputed control of the world economy, producing goods of such high quality and low cost that foreign corporations were unable to compete. But in the mid-1960s the United States began to lose its advantage and by the 1980s American corporations lagged behind the competition in many industries. In the computer chip industry, for example, American corporations had lost most of both domestic and foreign markets by the early 1980s.The first analysts to examine the decline of American business blamed the U.S. government. They argued that stringent governmental restrictions on the behaviour of American corporations, combined with the wholehearted support given to foreign firms by their governments, created and environment in which American products could not compete. Later analysts blamed predatory corporate raiders who bought corporations, not to make them more competitive in the face of foreign competition, but rather to sell off the most lucrative divisions for huge profits.Still later analysts blamed the American workforce, citing labour demands and poor productivity as the reasons American corporations have been unable to compete with Japanese and European firms. Finally, a few analysts even censured American consumers for their unpatriotic purchases of foreign goods. The blame actually lies with corporate management, which has made serious errors based on misconceptions about what it takes to be successful in the marketplace.These missteps involve labour costs, production choices, and growth strategies. Even though labour costs typically account for less than 15% of a product‘s total cost, management has been quick to blame the costs of workers‘ wages for driving up prices, making American goods uncompetitive. As a result of attempts to minimize the cost of wages, American corporations have had trouble recruiting and retaining skilled workers.The emphasis on cost minimization has also led to another blunder: an over-concentration on high technology products. Many foreign firms began by specializing in the mass production and sale of low technology products, gaining valuable experience and earning tremendous profits. Later, these corporations were able to break into high technology markets without much trouble; they simply applied their previous manufacturing experience and ample financial resources to the production of higher quality goods. American business has consistently ignored this very sensible approach.The recent rash of corporate mergers and acquisitions in the U.S. has not helped the situation either. While American firms have neglected long-range planning and production, preferring instead to reap fast profits through mergers and acquisitions, foreign firms have been quick to exploit opportunities to ensure their domination over future markets by investing in the streamlining and modernization of their facilities.Which of the following would most weaken the author‘s argument about the over-concentration on high technology products?  a.Producing low tech products is not as profitable as producing high tech products. b.Manufacturing high tech products is a completely different process than manufacturing low tech goods.  c.Most of the low tech products purchased by Americans are made by foreign firms.  d.Most of the high tech products purchased by Americans are made by foreign firms.e.Most of the high tech products purchased by Americans are made by American firms.