Knowee
Questions
Features
Study Tools

n the Book of Mormon, Captain Moroni often achieves stretches of time when the Lamanites and the Nephites are not at war with each other. These periods of peace are best understood as examples of __________.Group of answer choicesnegative peacepositive peacecultural peaceAll of the above.

Question

n the Book of Mormon, Captain Moroni often achieves stretches of time when the Lamanites and the Nephites are not at war with each other. These periods of peace are best understood as examples of __________.Group of answer choicesnegative peacepositive peacecultural peaceAll of the above.

🧐 Not the exact question you are looking for?Go ask a question

Solution

The periods of peace achieved by Captain Moroni in the Book of Mormon can be best understood as examples of negative peace.

Negative peace refers to the absence of violence or war, but it doesn't necessarily mean that there is complete harmony or justice. In the context of the Book of Mormon, Captain Moroni was able to achieve periods where the Lamanites and the Nephites were not at war, but it doesn't necessarily mean that there was complete harmony or justice between the two groups.

Positive peace, on the other hand, would imply not just the absence of violence or war, but also the presence of justice and harmony. Cultural peace would imply a state of peace that is deeply ingrained in the culture of the society.

Without more context, it's hard to say if the periods of peace achieved by Captain Moroni also included elements of positive peace or cultural peace. But they definitely included elements of negative peace, as they were periods without war.

This problem has been solved

Similar Questions

President Ezra Taft Benson explained, “If there is ever a conflict between earthly knowledge and the word of the prophet, you stand with _______.”Group of answer choicesWhat research has provenThe ProphetEducated authorities on the conflictCommon sense and reason

W02 Activity: Applying Theories of ConflictStart AssignmentDue Sunday by 9:59am Points 50 Submitting a text entry box or a website url Attempts 0 Allowed Attempts 3 Available until Mar 24 at 8:59amLearning to overcome our fear of conflict and see its creative potential takes practice. This activity will give you a chance to apply some of the principles you just learned as you study a conflict in which the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and some LGBTQ rights groups have avoided a destructive cycle or conflict and instead modeled a more creative dynamic.TASKSRead Conflict & Peace Reader, “Religious Liberty & LGBTQ RightsLinks to an external site.” (8 pages).Write a detailed response to each of the questions below. Refer to the rubric to understand how this assignment will be graded.Submit the assignment by copying and pasting it into the text entry box.Review the requirements for the next assignment and formulate a plan to complete them on time.REMEMBERPractice the Wood Principle — if there is any side you don’t agree with, strive to respect, understand, and state its case in the strongest possible way. Also practice the principle Krister Stendahl articulated so well — leave room for “holy envy.”ESSAY QUESTIONSAfter studying the reading, use your knowledge of the key concepts from this module to write detailed answers to each of the following questions:Points of Demarcation – What are the most important boundaries for each side and why are those boundaries important to them? First describe the boundaries that are important to the Church (in about 100 words). Then describe the boundaries that are important to Equality Utah (in about 100 words).Encroachment & Resistance – How does each side encroach across the other side’s boundaries? How does each side resist the encroachment of the other? First describe how groups like Equality Utah encroach over the boundaries that are important to the Church, and how the Church resists (in about 100 words). Then describe how the Church encroaches over the boundaries that are important to Equality Utah, and how Equality Utah resists (in about 100 words).Surrender & Re-Demarcation – How has each side engaged in forms of surrender? In what ways have new boundaries been drawn or old boundaries been reinforced? First describe how the Church has surrendered in the conflict and accepted new boundaries (in about 100 words). Then describe how Equality Utah has surrendered in the conflict and accepted new boundaries (in about 100 words).Conflict Approach & Style – How does each side seem to approach conflict (smog or cocoon)? What is the basic conflict style (avoidance, accommodation, compromise, competition, or problem solving) that each side has adopted in this conflict? First describe the Church's style in this conflict (in about 100 words). Then describe Equality Utah's style in this conflict (in about 100 words).RubricW02 Activity: Applying Theories of ConflictW02 Activity: Applying Theories of ConflictCriteria Ratings PtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome1. Neutrality & Wood Principle10 ptsCompleteDescriptions of each side's perspective of the conflict are equally represented AND are ones that each side would accept about themselves.8 ptsDevelopingDescriptions of each side's perspective of the conflict are equally represented.6 ptsIncompleteDescriptions of each side's perspective of the conflict are not equally represented.0 ptsAbsentDescriptions contain little or none of each side's perspective.10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome2. Conflict Cycle Analysis20 ptsCompleteThe analysis correctly connects the conflict to all four aspects of the Conflict Cycle AND identifies details that illustrate moments of creative or destructive choices.16 ptsDevelopingThe analysis correctly connects the conflict to at least three aspects of the Conflict Cycle AND identifies details that illustrate moments of creative or destructive choices.12 ptsIncompleteThe analysis correctly connects the conflict to at least two aspects of the Conflict Cycle OR does not include details that illustrate moments of creative or destructive choices.0 ptsAbsentThe analysis is missing or is incorrect.20 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome3. Conflict Style Analysis10 ptsCompleteThe analysis describes each side's general approach to the conflict AND accurately connects it to a conflict style.8 ptsDevelopingThe analysis describes each side's general approach to the conflict.6 ptsIncompleteThe analysis does not accurately describe each side's general approach to the conflict.0 ptsAbsentThe analysis is missing or does not address the prompt.10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome4. Writing Style10 ptsCompleteWriting has no detectable patterns of errors that impede understanding of the message.7 ptsDevelopingWriting has errors that impede understanding of the message0 ptsAbsentWriting is incomprehensible.

W02 Activity: Applying Theories of ConflictStart AssignmentDue Sunday by 9:59am Points 50 Submitting a text entry box or a website url Attempts 0 Allowed Attempts 3 Available until Mar 24 at 8:59amLearning to overcome our fear of conflict and see its creative potential takes practice. This activity will give you a chance to apply some of the principles you just learned as you study a conflict in which the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and some LGBTQ rights groups have avoided a destructive cycle or conflict and instead modeled a more creative dynamic.TASKSRead Conflict & Peace Reader, “Religious Liberty & LGBTQ RightsLinks to an external site.” (8 pages).Write a detailed response to each of the questions below. Refer to the rubric to understand how this assignment will be graded.Submit the assignment by copying and pasting it into the text entry box.Review the requirements for the next assignment and formulate a plan to complete them on time.REMEMBERPractice the Wood Principle — if there is any side you don’t agree with, strive to respect, understand, and state its case in the strongest possible way. Also practice the principle Krister Stendahl articulated so well — leave room for “holy envy.”ESSAY QUESTIONSAfter studying the reading, use your knowledge of the key concepts from this module to write detailed answers to each of the following questions:Points of Demarcation – What are the most important boundaries for each side and why are those boundaries important to them? First describe the boundaries that are important to the Church (in about 100 words). Then describe the boundaries that are important to Equality Utah (in about 100 words).Encroachment & Resistance – How does each side encroach across the other side’s boundaries? How does each side resist the encroachment of the other? First describe how groups like Equality Utah encroach over the boundaries that are important to the Church, and how the Church resists (in about 100 words). Then describe how the Church encroaches over the boundaries that are important to Equality Utah, and how Equality Utah resists (in about 100 words).Surrender & Re-Demarcation – How has each side engaged in forms of surrender? In what ways have new boundaries been drawn or old boundaries been reinforced? First describe how the Church has surrendered in the conflict and accepted new boundaries (in about 100 words). Then describe how Equality Utah has surrendered in the conflict and accepted new boundaries (in about 100 words).Conflict Approach & Style – How does each side seem to approach conflict (smog or cocoon)? What is the basic conflict style (avoidance, accommodation, compromise, competition, or problem solving) that each side has adopted in this conflict? First describe the Church's style in this conflict (in about 100 words). Then describe Equality Utah's style in this conflict (in about 100 words).RubricW02 Activity: Applying Theories of ConflictW02 Activity: Applying Theories of ConflictCriteria Ratings PtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome1. Neutrality & Wood Principle10 ptsCompleteDescriptions of each side's perspective of the conflict are equally represented AND are ones that each side would accept about themselves.8 ptsDevelopingDescriptions of each side's perspective of the conflict are equally represented.6 ptsIncompleteDescriptions of each side's perspective of the conflict are not equally represented.0 ptsAbsentDescriptions contain little or none of each side's perspective.10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome2. Conflict Cycle Analysis20 ptsCompleteThe analysis correctly connects the conflict to all four aspects of the Conflict Cycle AND identifies details that illustrate moments of creative or destructive choices.16 ptsDevelopingThe analysis correctly connects the conflict to at least three aspects of the Conflict Cycle AND identifies details that illustrate moments of creative or destructive choices.12 ptsIncompleteThe analysis correctly connects the conflict to at least two aspects of the Conflict Cycle OR does not include details that illustrate moments of creative or destructive choices.0 ptsAbsentThe analysis is missing or is incorrect.20 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome3. Conflict Style Analysis10 ptsCompleteThe analysis describes each side's general approach to the conflict AND accurately connects it to a conflict style.8 ptsDevelopingThe analysis describes each side's general approach to the conflict.6 ptsIncompleteThe analysis does not accurately describe each side's general approach to the conflict.0 ptsAbsentThe analysis is missing or does not address the prompt.10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome4. Writing Style10 ptsCompleteWriting has no detectable patterns of errors that impede understanding of the message.7 ptsDevelopingWriting has errors that impede understanding of the message0 ptsAbsentWriting is incomprehensible

Bernini’s statue of David differed from his predecessors by showing David ____.Group of answer choiceswaiting for the enemyin the moment of combatafter he had slain Goliathnone of the answers

Mormons abstain from all of these EXCEPT_______________________Group of answer choicesAlcoholPorkCoffeeTobacco

1/1

Upgrade your grade with Knowee

Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.