To determine which example would increase a person's motivation according to attribution theory, we need to understand how different types of attributions affect motivation. Attribution theory suggests that people explain their successes and failures based on internal or external factors, and these attributions can be stable or unstable, and controllable or uncontrollable.

Let's analyze each option:

a. A student misses out on getting a place in the district band and attributes their failure to a lack of practice.
- This attribution is internal (related to the student's own actions) and controllable (the student can choose to practice more). According to attribution theory, this type of attribution can increase motivation because the student believes they can improve by putting in more effort.

b. A student wins a running race and attributes their success to their natural abilities.
- This attribution is internal (related to the student's own abilities) but is considered stable and uncontrollable (natural abilities are not easily changed). While this may boost the student's confidence, it may not necessarily increase motivation to work harder, as the success is seen as a result of inherent talent rather than effort.

c. A student gets top marks in a quiz and attributes their success to the test being easy.
- This attribution is external (related to the test, not the student's actions) and uncontrollable (the student cannot change the difficulty of the test). This type of attribution is less likely to increase motivation because the student does not see their own effort as the cause of their success.

Based on this analysis, the example that would most likely increase a person's motivation is:

a. A student misses out on getting a place in the district band and attributes their failure to a lack of practice.

Question

To determine which example would increase a person's motivation according to attribution theory, we need to understand how different types of attributions affect motivation. Attribution theory suggests that people explain their successes and failures based on internal or external factors, and these attributions can be stable or unstable, and controllable or uncontrollable.

Let's analyze each option:

a. A student misses out on getting a place in the district band and attributes their failure to a lack of practice.
- This attribution is internal (related to the student's own actions) and controllable (the student can choose to practice more). According to attribution theory, this type of attribution can increase motivation because the student believes they can improve by putting in more effort.

b. A student wins a running race and attributes their success to their natural abilities.
- This attribution is internal (related to the student's own abilities) but is considered stable and uncontrollable (natural abilities are not easily changed). While this may boost the student's confidence, it may not necessarily increase motivation to work harder, as the success is seen as a result of inherent talent rather than effort.

c. A student gets top marks in a quiz and attributes their success to the test being easy.
- This attribution is external (related to the test, not the student's actions) and uncontrollable (the student cannot change the difficulty of the test). This type of attribution is less likely to increase motivation because the student does not see their own effort as the cause of their success.

Based on this analysis, the example that would most likely increase a person's motivation is:

a. A student misses out on getting a place in the district band and attributes their failure to a lack of practice.

Knowee AI · Accepted Answer

To determine which example would increase a person's motivation according to attribution theory, we need to understand how different types of attributions affect motivation. Attribution theory suggests that people explain their successes and failures based on internal or external factors, and these attributions can be stable or unstable, and controllable or uncontrollable.

Let's analyze each option:

a. A student misses out on getting a place in the district band and attributes their failure to a lack of practice.
- This attribution is internal (related to the student's own actions) and controllable (the student can choose to practice more). According to attribution theory, this type of attribution can increase motivation because the student believes they can improve by putting in more effort.

b. A student wins a running race and attributes their success to their natural abilities.
- This attribution is internal (related to the student's own abilities) but is considered stable and uncontrollable (natural abilities are not easily changed). While this may boost the student's confidence, it may not necessarily increase motivation to work harder, as the success is seen as a result of inherent talent rather than effort.

c. A student gets top marks in a quiz and attributes their success to the test being easy.
- This attribution is external (related to the test, not the student's actions) and uncontrollable (the student cannot change the difficulty of the test). This type of attribution is less likely to increase motivation because the student does not see their own effort as the cause of their success.

Based on this analysis, the example that would most likely increase a person's motivation is:

a. A student misses out on getting a place in the district band and attributes their failure to a lack of practice.

Question

Solution

Similar Questions

Upgrade your grade with Knowee