One consequence of today's high-choice media system isMultiple Choicethat individuals are more informed.None of these answers are correct.that individual choice is actually more limited.a narrowing in the information divide.an increase in the number of people who use partisan outlets as their primary news source.

The question seems to be asking for the consequence of today's high-choice media system. However, without any context or specific information, it's difficult to definitively choose one of the multiple-choice options.

1. "That individuals are more informed" - This could be true as a high-choice media system means individuals have access to a wide range of information sources. However, the quality and accuracy of information can vary, and not all individuals may have the skills to discern reliable from unreliable sources.

2. "None of these answers are correct" - Without context, it's impossible to determine if this is the correct answer.

3. "That individual choice is actually more limited" - This seems counterintuitive as a high-choice media system implies more options, not less. However, if the question implies that the overwhelming number of choices leads to decision fatigue or a reliance on a few familiar sources, then this could be a potential consequence.

4. "A narrowing in the information divide" - This could be a potential consequence as a high-choice media system could mean more individuals have access to information that was previously inaccessible. However, this assumes that all individuals have equal access to and can equally benefit from this system, which may not be the case.

5. "An increase in the number of people who use partisan outlets as their primary news source" - This could be a potential consequence as individuals may choose sources that align with their existing beliefs, leading to an increase in the use of partisan outlets.

Without more context or information, it's difficult to definitively choose one of these options as the correct answer.