Between the years 300 BCE and 300 CE, two great empires arose: one surrounding the Mediterranean Sea, the other in China. The rulers of China's Han dynasty extended their power to unite much of what is today's China. The Han created a strong military and expanded trade with far-off peoples over the Silk Road. Similarly, the Romans extended their reach from Rome, in what is today Italy, throughout the area surrounding the Mediterranean Sea in Europe and Africa. The Romans likewise relied on a strong military as they occupied new lands and brought the residents they conquered into the Roman Empire. Both empires built many kilometres of new roads and structures to transport water (canals and aqueducts). Finally, both powerfully influenced the cultures that followed them.Which organisational structure does this text primarily use?
Question
Between the years 300 BCE and 300 CE, two great empires arose: one surrounding the Mediterranean Sea, the other in China. The rulers of China's Han dynasty extended their power to unite much of what is today's China. The Han created a strong military and expanded trade with far-off peoples over the Silk Road. Similarly, the Romans extended their reach from Rome, in what is today Italy, throughout the area surrounding the Mediterranean Sea in Europe and Africa. The Romans likewise relied on a strong military as they occupied new lands and brought the residents they conquered into the Roman Empire. Both empires built many kilometres of new roads and structures to transport water (canals and aqueducts). Finally, both powerfully influenced the cultures that followed them.Which organisational structure does this text primarily use?
Solution
The primary organizational structure used in this text is comparison and contrast. The text compares and contrasts the Han dynasty in China and the Roman Empire, highlighting their similarities and differences in terms of military strength, trade, territorial expansion, infrastructure development, and cultural influence.
Similar Questions
Before answering the question, read the following excerpt.The Han dynasty was contemporaneous [existed at the same time] with the Roman Empire and has often been compared to it. Han and Rome both had strong governments that expanded geographically, promoted assimilation, and brought centuries of stability to the central regions. Both managed to deal with enormous problems of scale, ruling roughly similar numbers of people over roughly similar expanses of land. Both developed bureaucratic institutions, staffing them with educated landowners. Both invested in the construction of roads, defensive walls, and waterworks. Both were threatened by barbarians at their frontiers and often used barbarian tribal units as military auxiliaries.The contrasts between the Han and Roman empires are equally instructive. China was a civilization based much more profoundly on crop agriculture. Not only did animal husbandry play less of a role in agriculture, but cities and commerce played a lesser role in the overall economy. Cultural cohesion was also of a different order in Han China than in Rome. Perhaps because of the Chinese script, it is much easier to talk about a common culture among the elite in Han China than in the Roman Empire.From Patricia Buckley Ebrey, The Cambridge Illustrated History of China (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996, 2010), 85.Why might historians see value in comparing Han China and Rome?Choose 1 answer:Choose 1 answer:(Choice A) They had many interactions with each other. AThey had many interactions with each other.(Choice B) All comparisons have historical value.BAll comparisons have historical value.(Choice C) They existed at the same time and had nothing else in common.CThey existed at the same time and had nothing else in common.(Choice D) They existed at the same time and had similar political structures. DThey existed at the same time and had similar political structures.
Between the 2nd century BCE and the 15th century CE, civilizations from China to the Mediterranean were connected by an immense trade network spanning more than 6,000 miles. This network, known as the Great Silk Road, transcended simple commercial interactions, functioning as a vessel for the spread of ideologies, cultures, and religious beliefs. Despite harsh deserts, challenging mountainous terrains, and uncertain weather conditions, merchants persevered along this influential path. The Silk Road's lasting influence is evidenced in the widespread dissemination of goods such as silk, spices, precious metals, and innovations like paper and gunpowder, significantly influencing pre-existing empires and making an indelible mark on the course of human history.10 Mark For Review10According to the text, why was the Great Silk Road relevant in history?A) It facilitated not just trade and commerce but also cultural interchange between China and the Mediterranean. B) A significant number of people experienced great difficulties navigating its treacherous deserts and formidable mountain passes. C) Spanning over 6000 miles, it was one of the longest routes ever navigated in human history.D) By providing critical resources like gunpowder and paper, it directly fostered the creation of powerful empires.
The Silk RoadAn ancient network of trading routesThe so-called 'silk road' began during the Han Dynasty in ancient China. It was the nickname given to any route that went through China to Europe. It linked trade in the East to the West, and vice versa. It was not even a single route, but a complex network of land and sea routes, covering over 6,400 kilometres and lasting for approximately 1,400 years. Needless to say, the 'silk road' played a central role in economic, cultural, political and religious exchanges during this time.The European explorer, Marco Polo (1254-1324) is known to have travelled on and talked about these routes, but it was the German geographer and traveller, Fernando von Richthofen in 1877 who first referred to them as the 'silk road'.(1) The purpose of his trip was to establish diplomatic and commercial relations with China, Japan and Siam and it was the first of many trips that Von Richthofen made to this region of the world.A range of different goods were transported along the 'silk road'. From East to West, this included silk, tea, precious stones, spices, medicine and paper, and from West to East, glassware, honey, fruits, textiles, gold and silver.(2) This was one of the most popular goods exchanged between the two empires at the time. The 'silk road' itself stretched from China to Africa, Greece, Italy and even Great Britain. The network of 'silk road' routes was huge.One of the greatest values of the 'silk road', in addition to its trade value, was the opportunities it offered for an exchange of beliefs and values between different cultures.(3) This also applied to architecture. How many times can we still see the influence of other cultures and history in the buildings that we visit today?Unfortunately, the 'silk road' also became the carrier of more than one deadly disease.(4) No one can ever be sure of this, but it is believed that the illness first had its origins in the Himalayan mountains of South Asia the 1200s, and by means of the 'silk road' eventually reached other empires, including China, the Mediterranean, North Africa and Europe by the early to mid-1300s.In addition to extensive silk trade with countries such as Egypt, Greece and Italy, the 'silk road' was also responsible for the transportation of paper and gunpowder across the continents.(5) The use of paper and gunpowder became key to many civilisations, as did the international exchange of spices. Even today, these still influence how we cook and prepare food across the world!Despite its survival for well over 1,400 years, trading along the 'silk road' ended suddenly with the rise of the Ottoman Empire in 1453.(6) The result of this change led European traders to look for, and explore, alternative trade routes and the 'Age of Discovery', from the 15th to 17th century was born.
Article written by the historian S.A.M. Adshead and published in an academic journal in 1961.We may talk about “the Chinese and the Roman empires” and use the same word “empire” to describe them both. Are we, however, justified in so doing?Firstly, the Roman empire was maritime, mercantile, urban and militaristic. It was based on the Mediterranean and the unity of the trade routes, crisscrossing the Mediterranean and spilling out into the Black Sea. The [Han] Chinese empire, on the other hand, was territorial, agricultural, rural and civilian. It was based on the river valleys of the [Yellow] and Yangtse and on the unity of agricultural techniques over this area.Secondly, the Roman empire was socially unharmonious, was torn by class conflict, and was highly unstable. The Chinese empire, on the other hand, was socially harmonious, had no irreconcilable class conflicts and was highly stable.
How did the Silk Road impact warfare during the early Middle Ages?AGunpowder was traded along the route to western civilizations.BDissatisfaction with the price of goods sent western territories into the east.CAdvanced weaponry became suddenly available to multiple civilizations at once.DKnowledge of other civilizations through trade encouraged Rome to go to war to expand their territories.
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.