Vaccinated children are less likely than unvaccinated children to develop long COVID, the myriad of symptoms that can last for months to years following a SARS-CoV-2 infection. In the United States, COVID-19 vaccines are recommended for children as young as 6 months old. But uptake has been low. For the study, Anna Yousaf, a medical officer at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in Atlanta, Georgia, and her colleagues enrolled 1,600 children and collected weekly nasal swabs from them for more than a year to check for the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The team narrowed the study to 622 participants — aged 5 to 17 years — who caught COVID-19; 28 went on to develop long COVID. The researchers then calculated the odds of vaccinated and unvaccinated children experiencing ongoing symptoms.8Mark for ReviewMCQABCWhich one of the following, if true, most seriously invalidates the argument?AThe study defined long COVID as the persistence of symptoms after one month, whereas the World Health Organization describes long COVID as symptoms that last for at least two months.BThe study initially included several broadly defined symptoms that children might experience on a regular basis but excluded sufferers from the final count. CThere has been a lag in reporting of vaccination numbers in the United States and there are likely more vaccinated children than previously suspected. DWeekly nasal swabs are not frequent enough a check to determine the onset of SARS-CoV-2 and to determine whether an individual has the infection or not.
Question
Vaccinated children are less likely than unvaccinated children to develop long COVID, the myriad of symptoms that can last for months to years following a SARS-CoV-2 infection. In the United States, COVID-19 vaccines are recommended for children as young as 6 months old. But uptake has been low. For the study, Anna Yousaf, a medical officer at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in Atlanta, Georgia, and her colleagues enrolled 1,600 children and collected weekly nasal swabs from them for more than a year to check for the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The team narrowed the study to 622 participants — aged 5 to 17 years — who caught COVID-19; 28 went on to develop long COVID. The researchers then calculated the odds of vaccinated and unvaccinated children experiencing ongoing symptoms.8Mark for ReviewMCQABCWhich one of the following, if true, most seriously invalidates the argument?AThe study defined long COVID as the persistence of symptoms after one month, whereas the World Health Organization describes long COVID as symptoms that last for at least two months.BThe study initially included several broadly defined symptoms that children might experience on a regular basis but excluded sufferers from the final count. CThere has been a lag in reporting of vaccination numbers in the United States and there are likely more vaccinated children than previously suspected. DWeekly nasal swabs are not frequent enough a check to determine the onset of SARS-CoV-2 and to determine whether an individual has the infection or not.
Solution
The option that most seriously invalidates the argument, if true, would be B. The study initially included several broadly defined symptoms that children might experience on a regular basis but excluded sufferers from the final count. This could potentially skew the results, as it may exclude children who actually have long COVID but whose symptoms are not considered severe or specific enough according to the study's criteria.
Similar Questions
Short answer (3 points):Directions: Read the following passage (in italics), and then write a summary of the key points in your own words. Even though the virus that causes COVID-19 is transmitted through the respiratory system, that’s not all it affects. The virus can cause damage to children, just as it does to adults. There is even a rare but serious associated disease specific to children that we are just beginning to understand. It’s also true that children spread COVID-19. The largest study involving children and transmission is one from from South Korea that traced nearly 60,000 people, and found that children 10 and older transmit the virus at least as well as adults. This shouldn’t be surprising considering our experience with other respiratory infections. How many of us parents have had the experience of becoming sick after our kids pick up colds at school?Some people who support on-time school reopening point to European countries that have had few outbreaks after resuming in-person instruction. However, these countries undertook many safety measures, including enforcing social distancing and implementing regular testing. They also had far lower rates of COVID-19 in the community than we do.There remains a lot that we don't know about COVID-19 and children, but we know that children can become infected, and that they can transmit the virus to others. Let’s stop justifying school reopenings based on false statements. Instead, let’s talk about how we can get widespread, rapid testing into schools, the importance of wearing masks, and the investments we need to make to reduce the density of students in classrooms and improve their physical layout, ventilation and other infrastructure.
The CDC schedule lists the recommended immunizations by age.TrueFalse
The disease COVID-19 is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2). The virus was first identified at the beginning of 2020, and has since gone on to cause a pandemic. It is currently believed that SARS-CoV-2 is an example of a zoonosis.Throughout 2020, much of the world’s medical scientific community was devoted to developing a vaccine for SARS-CoV-2. To evaluate the effectiveness of new vaccines, both humoral and cell-mediated responses are measured in animal subjects. Identify the cell type that is involved in both responses, and explain its role in each.
In 2020, scientists are working across the globe to quickly create a safe and effective vaccine to protect individuals against COVID-19. The creation of a safe vaccine is a long process with many steps. The fastest vaccine ever created took about 4 years to make.Flu shot by Military Health System (CC0)As scientists are working to make a vaccine against COVID-19, which of the following do they need to take into consideration?Elimination ToolSelect one answerAThe number of people infected with COVID-19.BThe number of people infected with other viruses.CThe safety of the vaccine when injected into a human patient.DThe amount that each vaccine will cost.
Why do people not vaccinate?By Hal WillabyPublished in The Conversation March 27th 2014The National Health Performance Authority’s report on childhood vaccination coverage released this morning shows immunisation rates have slightly increased in 2011–2012. But there are still some areas where coverage is below the national target.The good news is that Australia has one of the highest vaccination rates in the world with over 90% of children fully immunised by age five. But there are areas where only 80% of five-year-olds are protected against preventable contagious disease.So why are some children not immunised? There are two broad influences on timely uptake of routine childhood vaccines – access and acceptance.Access is partly a structural problem, linked to barriers such as a lack of transport, limited clinic opening times, homeboundedness and, beyond that, to poverty and social exclusion. Generally speaking, we can address access problems by minimising these barriers.The other factor impacting vaccine uptake is acceptance. This is the psychological orientation to vaccines influencing uptake; it’s about attitudes, beliefs and concerns regarding vaccines, parenting, medicine generally, and a host of related matters. An individual’s vaccine acceptance is the result of a certain composition of these, like a metaphorical DNA.The public tends to hear a lot more about acceptance factors than they do about access. It’s an easy formula for mass media to pit vaccination opponents against proponents, and parade examples of non-vaccinating parents. It excites emotion, leading to high click rates in online articles and crowded comments pages.Nevertheless, the attention given to such parents is out of proportion to their actual numbers, and the likelihood of changing their minds. Vaccine refusers are a very small proportion in Australia – about 2% of parents make a values-based choice to forego all vaccines for their children.A more interesting group is the 12% of parents who are at least somewhat supportive of vaccination, but fear both vaccination and non-vaccination could have negative outcomes for their child. About half of that 12% vaccinate fully, and the other half may delay or avoid certain vaccines but will have others.Any action taken at the community level starts with acknowledging that parents want the best for their children regardless of their access to and acceptance of vaccines. When otherwise well-intentioned messages criticise what these parents view as healthy skepticism, the result can be a further distancing from timely uptake.Based on the information in the article, suggest three broad strategies for increasing vaccination rates amongst Australian children.
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.