Knowee
Questions
Features
Study Tools

For neural machine translation we typically use encoder decoder architecture. Which of the following statements are correct regarding the disadvantages of RNN/LSTM/GRU variants of encoder decoder architecture?Question 3Answera.None of theseb.For long sentence it give good accuracy and computationally expensivec.Input sequence can be larged.Vanishing gradient problem

Question

For neural machine translation we typically use encoder decoder architecture. Which of the following statements are correct regarding the disadvantages of RNN/LSTM/GRU variants of encoder decoder architecture?Question 3Answera.None of theseb.For long sentence it give good accuracy and computationally expensivec.Input sequence can be larged.Vanishing gradient problem

🧐 Not the exact question you are looking for?Go ask a question

Solution

The correct answer is b and d.

b. For long sentences, it gives good accuracy and is computationally expensive: This is true. RNNs, LSTMs, and GRUs are all capable of handling long sequences, which is beneficial for tasks like machine translation. However, this comes at the cost of computational expense, especially for very long sequences.

d. Vanishing gradient problem: This is also true. RNNs are particularly susceptible to the vanishing gradient problem, which can make them difficult to train effectively. LSTMs and GRUs were designed to mitigate this issue, but they are not completely immune to it.

Option a is incorrect because options b and d are correct. Option c is incorrect because while these models can handle large input sequences, it is not a disadvantage.

This problem has been solved

Similar Questions

advantages of encoder decoder in rnn

What is the main advantage of using recurrent neural networks (RNNs) for language modeling over n-gram models?<br /> A. a. RNNs can model arbitrary long-range dependencies <br />B. b. RNNs are less prone to overfitting <br />C. c. RNNs require less training data <br />D. d. RNNs are easier to implement

What is the advantage of using the attention mechanism over a traditional recurrent neural network (RNN) encoder-decoder?The attention mechanism is more cost-effective than a traditional RNN encoder-decoder.The attention mechanism is faster than a traditional RNN encoder-decoder.The attention mechanism requires less CPU threads than a traditional RNN encoder-decoder.The attention mechanism lets the decoder focus on specific parts of the input sequence, which can improve the accuracy of the translation.

What is the key advantage of using LSTMs over basic RNNs in sequence generation tasks?Less prone to overfittingLower computational costSimpler architectureAbility to remember long-term dependenciesFaster training speeds

Which problem in RNNs does LSTM help to address?High varianceVanishing gradientOverfittingAll of the options givenBias

1/3

Upgrade your grade with Knowee

Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.