QuizInstructions: Please provide an answer for all questions. Each question is one point. Click on the Submit button to register your answers. After submitting your answers, the correct answer to each question and an explanation will be displayed. Navigational links to the next module will also be provided.All quiz questions count towards your score. You should answer all questions.Question 1The NBAC looks at characteristics individuals might have that would prevent them from being able to provide voluntary informed consent. The traits may be thought of as falling into six broad areas: cognitive or communicative, institutional, deferential, medical, economic, and social. Prospective research subjects who are not able to comprehend information, deliberate, and make decisions about participation in a proposed research study have a: Economic or social vulnerability Institutional vulnerability Physical vulnerability Cognitive or communicative vulnerabilityQuestion 2When an IRB is reviewing a research study and they are considering if a potential subject population is vulnerable, they should consider: Are there adequate resources to conduct the study? Is there a power differential between researchers and subjects? Are the research procedures greater than minimal risk of harm? Has the researcher completed required training?Question 3A subject participates in a drug study because treatment is available at no or reduced cost, and he could not otherwise afford it. This is an example of: Communicative vulnerability Economic vulnerability Social vulnerability Institutional vulnerabilityQuestion 4Which is true of inducements in research? Inducements constitute an “undue influence” if they alter a potential subject’s decision-making processes, such that they do not appropriately weigh the risk-benefit relationship of the research. Inducements, like coercion, are always inappropriate, as they violate the ethical principle of respect for persons. Offering $10 for an hour long research study constitutes undue inducement. Like coercion, undue inducement is easy for IRBs to determine.Question 5In considering NBAC’s analytic approach, an otherwise competent person who is acutely ill might be considered at especially high risk of harm for: Capacity-related cognitive vulnerability Communicative vulnerability Situational cognitive vulnerability Economic vulnerability

Question 1The NBAC looks at characteristics individuals might have that would prevent them from being able to provide voluntary informed consent. The traits may be thought of as falling into six broad areas: cognitive or communicative, institutional, deferential, medical, economic, and social. Prospective research subjects who are not able to comprehend information, deliberate, and make decisions about participation in a proposed research study have a: Economic or social vulnerability Institutional vulnerability Physical vulnerability Cognitive or communicative vulnerabilityQuestion 2When an IRB is reviewing a research study and they are considering if a potential subject population is vulnerable, they should consider: Are there adequate resources to conduct the study? Is there a power differential between researchers and subjects? Are the research procedures greater than minimal risk of harm? Has the researcher completed required training?Question 3A subject participates in a drug study because treatment is available at no or reduced cost, and he could not otherwise afford it. This is an example of: Communicative vulnerability Economic vulnerability Social vulnerability Institutional vulnerabilityQuestion 4Which is true of inducements in research? Inducements constitute an “undue influence” if they alter a potential subject’s decision-making processes, such that they do not appropriately weigh the risk-benefit relationship of the research. Inducements, like coercion, are always inappropriate, as they violate the ethical principle of respect for persons. Offering $10 for an hour long research study constitutes undue inducement. Like coercion, undue inducement is easy for IRBs to determine.Question 5In considering NBAC’s analytic approach, an otherwise competent person who is acutely ill might be considered at especially high risk of harm for: Capacity-related cognitive vulnerability Communicative vulnerability Situational cognitive vulnerability Economic vulnerability

QuizInstructions: Please provide an answer for all questions. Each question is one point. Click on the Submit button to register your answers. After submitting your answers, the correct answer to each question and an explanation will be displayed. Navigational links to the next module will also be provided.All quiz questions count towards your score. You should answer all questions.Question 1Which is an example of a situation where deferential vulnerability might be a factor? A physician recruiting patients to be subjects An employer recruiting among persons who directly report to them An army medical officer recruiting subjects among lower ranks A college professor recruiting among their studentsQuestion 2Subjects with a serious illness may be at risk for exploitation because they may be desperate for a possible cure. This is an example of: Deferential vulnerability Economic vulnerability Medical vulnerability Therapeutic misconceptionQuestion 3When an IRB is reviewing a research study and they are considering if a potential subject population is vulnerable, they should consider: Are the research procedures greater than minimal risk of harm? Are there adequate resources to conduct the study? Is there a power differential between researchers and subjects? Has the researcher completed required training?Question 4Which is true of inducements in research? Inducements, like coercion, are always inappropriate, as they violate the ethical principle of respect for persons. Like coercion, undue inducement is easy for IRBs to determine. Offering $10 for an hour long research study constitutes undue inducement. Inducements constitute an “undue influence” if they alter a potential subject’s decision-making processes, such that they do not appropriately weigh the risk-benefit relationship of the research.Question 5A subject participates in a drug study because treatment is available at no or reduced cost, and he could not otherwise afford it. This is an example of: Economic vulnerability Communicative vulnerability Institutional vulnerability Social vulnerability

create a quiz about the information above

InstructionsCreate a survey about healthcare access in your area.  Your survey should collect information about a person's ability to obtain diagnosis, treatment or prevention management from a healthcare provider.  The questions should focus on the person's experience, not what they "think" should happen.  The survey should be 5 questions long.Included in this survey should be two (2) demographic questions and three (3) content questions.Pilot test and refine your survey.

Which of the following is NOT a common component of any research questionnaire?thoughtful conclusionsthe right combination of questionslengthy introductionsinstructions and warm-up questions