There exists only one possible 3NF decomposition for any relation schema and any set of functional dependencies.Question 4Select one:TrueFalse
Question
There exists only one possible 3NF decomposition for any relation schema and any set of functional dependencies.Question 4Select one:TrueFalse
Solution
False.
There can be more than one possible 3NF (Third Normal Form) decomposition for a given relation schema and set of functional dependencies. The decomposition into 3NF depends on the set of functional dependencies and the process used for decomposition. Different sets of functional dependencies or different decomposition processes can lead to different 3NF decompositions.
Similar Questions
Consider relation StudentInfo(sID, name, dorm, major) with functional dependency sID → name and multivalued dependency sID ↠ dorm. What schema would be produced by the 4NF decomposition algorithm?
Consider the universal relation R = {A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J} and the set of functional dependencies F = { {A, B}→{C}, {A}→{D, E}, {B}→{F}, {F}→{G,H}, {D}→{I, J} }. What is the key for R? Decompose R into 2NF and then 3NF relation
What is TRUE about the Third Normal Form (3NF)?a.All of the answerb.Data duplication is reduced by using 3NFc.When a relation is in 2NF and does not contain transitive partial dependencies, it will be in 3NFd.It helps maintain the integrity of the data
Let R(A,B,C,D,E,P,G) be a relational schema in which the following FDs are known to hold:AB->CDDE->PC->EP->CB->GThe relation schema R isin 3NF, but not in BCNFin BCNFin 2NF, but not in 3NFnot in 2NF
Consider a relation schema R = {A, B} and a set of functional dependencies Σ = {A → B}, AB must be a key of R.Question 5Select one:TrueFalse
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.