Read the passage and answer the question: "In City X, a correlation was found between the number of libraries and lower crime rates. Some policymakers argue for building more libraries to reduce crime." Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the policymakers' argument?
Question
Read the passage and answer the question: "In City X, a correlation was found between the number of libraries and lower crime rates. Some policymakers argue for building more libraries to reduce crime." Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the policymakers' argument?
Solution
Sure, here are some potential answers that would weaken the policymakers' argument:
-
If it was found that the correlation was not causation, meaning that the presence of libraries does not directly lead to lower crime rates. For example, it could be that areas with more libraries also have more educational or community resources in general, which could be the real cause of lower crime rates.
-
If it was found that the cost of building and maintaining more libraries would be greater than the cost of the crime. In this case, even if libraries do reduce crime, it might not be a cost-effective solution.
-
If it was found that the lower crime rates in areas with more libraries were due to other factors, such as a higher police presence or lower poverty rates. This would suggest that simply building more libraries would not necessarily reduce crime.
-
If it was found that the areas with more libraries also had smaller populations, meaning that the lower crime rates could be due to fewer people rather than the presence of libraries.
-
If it was found that the crime rates were already decreasing before the libraries were built, suggesting that the libraries did not cause the decrease in crime.
Similar Questions
Read the passage and answer the question: "Local government data shows that neighborhoods with more green spaces have lower crime rates. This has led to the proposal of increasing green spaces in high-crime areas. Critics, however, argue that the correlation does not prove that green spaces reduce crime." What is the main argument of the critics regarding the proposal?The data used to draw the conclusion that green spaces lower crime is inaccurate.Green spaces do not lower crime.The data does not conclusively prove that green spaces lower crime.High-crime areas cannot benefit from green spaces.
DIRECTION: Answer the question based on the information given. If highways were restricted to cars and only those trucks with capacity of less than 8 tons, most of the truck traffic would be forced to run outside highways. Such a reduction in the amount of truck traffic would reduce the risk of collisions on highways. Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the conclusion drawn in the second sentence?Choices:- Highways are experiencing overcrowded traffic mainly because of sharp increases in car traffic Many drivers of trucks would rather buy trucks with a capacity of less than 8 tons than be excluded from highways. The number of collisions that occur near highways has reduced in recent years Trucks that have a capacity of more than 8 tons cause a disproportionately large number of collisions on highways
A local city council’s study found that the correlation between number of liquor stores in a neighborhood and neighborhood crime rates across all city neighborhoods was r = 0.88.Which one of the following statements is true? As the number of liquor stores increase the crime rate will increase in that neighborhood. Closing liquor stores in a neighborhood will help to reduce the crime rate of that neighborhood. There is a pretty strong positive linear relationship between number of liquor stores and crime rates. Population is a possible lurking variable in this scenario, since areas that are more densely populated are more likely to have higher crime rates.
Look at the following graph and source to answer the question based on what you see in the graph AND what you know.Choose TWO correct answers.Question: What can you argue based on the data in this graph and source? "By 1925, half a dozen states, including New York, passed laws banning local police from investigating violations. Prohibition had little support in the cities of the Northeast and Midwest."Group of answer choicesProhibition should end because it's putting the lives of police in serious danger.Prohibition is working as it has led to the and increase in arrests and killings of gangs and mafia leadersProhibition is workig as cities have incrased its police forcesProhibition should end because the police have no authority in New York City
Which quote reveals the author's point of view and potential for bias?A."The rules surrounding charter schools are too complicated for many parents."B."The mayor expected her budget to pass easily and was surprised to find out that people were so strongly opposed to it."C."Like his father before him, the political candidate is running on a pro-business platform."D."As a recent immigrant, I support making permanent residence easier to obtain."SUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.