Evaluate the reliability of this source as evidence of historical facts. Does this source help with your understanding of medieval times?

How could you check if a historical source is reliable? The person who composed the source was there when the event took place The weaving was made by the local people during that period and was preserved very well The records were written by a scribe who was tasked with documenting the minutes of the meeting All of the above

Judging sources as unreliable regardless of evidence*

The examination of the truthfulness of the evidence, it looks at the content of the source and examines the circumstance of its production. It looks at the truthfulness and factuality of the evidence by looking at the author of the source, its context, the agenda behind its creation, the knowledge which informed it, and its intended purpose among others.Select one:a.Secondary Sourcesb.Primary Sourcesc.Internal Criticismd.External Criticism

Which type of evidence would a historian studying an event occurring in prehistory most likely have access to?written scrollsancient gunsbone fragmentsunbroken potteryoral histories

Select the correct answer.Which of these are considered when evaluating sources? A. an author’s credibility or authority B. the timeliness of the information or publishing dates C. the accuracy of evidence used to support information D. all of the above