Has devolution made Kenya's governance stronger or weaker over the past 10yrs? Citing various examples, discuss the above statement.

Devolution in Kenya, which was implemented following the 2010 constitution, has had both positive and negative impacts on the country's governance over the past decade.

On the positive side, devolution has brought government services closer to the people. This has led to improved service delivery in some counties, especially in areas such as health and infrastructure. For instance, counties like Makueni have been able to establish their own universal healthcare systems, while others like Machakos have invested heavily in infrastructural development.

Devolution has also enhanced public participation in governance, as it has given local communities a greater say in their own affairs. This has been evident in the increased involvement of citizens in budget-making processes at the county level.

However, devolution has also had its downsides. One of the major challenges has been the rise in corruption at the county level. Many county governments have been implicated in corruption scandals, leading to a waste of public resources. This has undermined service delivery and development in the affected counties.

Another challenge has been the frequent conflicts between county and national governments. These conflicts, often over resource allocation and functions, have sometimes hindered service delivery and development at the county level.

In conclusion, while devolution has made Kenya's governance stronger in some aspects, it has also introduced new challenges that have weakened it in other respects. Therefore, there is a need for continuous reforms to address these challenges and enhance the benefits of devolution.