What is wrong with the following "argumentative" thesis statement:"Social media censorship is bad and because it isn't ethical and limits what people can say online."Question 32Answera.it is informal (e.g., bad) and non-specific (e.g., isn't ethical, what people say)b.It is fine—a little informal but OK.c.it is informal (e.g., bad)d.It isn't argumentative

To what extent is internet censorship a merit to a nation? Your argument should include a thesis statement, relevant examples and a closing statement

Select the correct answer.Which thesis statement can be developed into a research paper with a clear opinion and supporting arguments? A. Racism was a central issue in the American civil rights movement. B. Laws against hate speech would go a long way in preventing discrimination. C. The First Amendment protects the right to free speech. D. It is illegal to discriminate against people because of their race.

in 250- 290 words, Is a journalist’s online (e.g. social media) behaviour an ethical issue? If so, how so? If not, why not?

When posting in the discussion forum, what type of behavior is acceptable?1 pointConveying your opinion clearly by arguing against someone’s perspective Using cursing to emphasize your pointSharing advertisements and product promotionsBeing sensitive, kind, and open-mindedCoursera Honor Code  Learn more

Read the following sentence.Social media are fun and more efficient than traditional ways of communicating. But when we socialize with computers, is something lost?What would most naturally come next in this argument?A.An argument that social media are ultimately negativeB.An explanation of "social media" and which sites offer themC.A proposal that social media should be banned in schoolsD.A summary of traditional means of socializing, such as partiesSUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS