1. Inductive reasoning starts from known facts and aims to generalize them to different systems where they might be acceptable. Deductive reasoning is a form of "if X is true, then Y is true." It goes from a known and applies it to a specific scenario. We can conclude that to build a theory, we use ... reasoning, but to test it/test a hypothesis, we use ... reasoning

Inductive reasoning is weaker than deductive reasoning because it:A.comes to a general conclusion based on a specific observation.B.includes support from unreliable experts to make a point.C.begins with a big idea that is supported with specifics.D.counts on the emotions of the audience to come to a decision.SUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS

Inductive reasoning is a method of thought or argument that:A.starts with a general idea and then uses specific examples or known facts to support that idea.B.starts from a specific idea to reach a more general conclusion.C.appeals to the emotions or values of the audience.D.relies on firmly held beliefs about the characteristics of a particular group of people.SUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS

Inference to the best explanation is a form of inductive reasoning in which we reason from premises about a state of affairs toGroup of answer choicesA deductive conclusionAn explanation for that state of affairsAn enumerative inductionAn analogical induction

_________ reasoning starts with a general idea and uses specific examples to support that idea. __________ reasoning starts with a more specific idea to draw a more general conclusion.A.Inductive; DeductiveB.Deductive; InductiveC.Inductive; CircularD.Circular; DeductiveSUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS

Determine whether each of the following arguments is an example of inductive reasoning or deductive reasoning. You go fishing, and every time you fish in a certain hole you never catch anything. You conclude that there are no fish in that hole.