Emerging market firms are typically more diversified into multiple and often unrelated products and industries than their Western counterparts. The most relevant explanation is based on Group of answer choiceslack of resource availability to firmsweak central and state governments in emerging marketspresence of institutional voids in emerging marketspresence of large markets in emerging markets
Question
Emerging market firms are typically more diversified into multiple and often unrelated products and industries than their Western counterparts. The most relevant explanation is based on Group of answer choiceslack of resource availability to firmsweak central and state governments in emerging marketspresence of institutional voids in emerging marketspresence of large markets in emerging markets
Solution
The most relevant explanation for emerging market firms being more diversified into multiple and often unrelated products and industries than their Western counterparts is the presence of institutional voids in emerging markets.
Here's why:
-
Institutional voids refer to the absence of specialized intermediaries, regulatory systems, and contract-enforcing mechanisms in emerging markets.
-
Due to these voids, firms cannot rely on the market to obtain resources or sell their products. Therefore, they diversify into multiple industries to ensure their survival and growth.
-
For example, a firm might diversify into manufacturing, distribution, and retail to control the entire value chain, because it cannot rely on the market to provide these services.
-
This is different from Western markets, where firms can specialize in one industry because they can rely on the market to provide resources and sell products.
-
Therefore, the presence of institutional voids in emerging markets is the most relevant explanation for why firms in these markets are more diversified.
Similar Questions
Speed of internationalization for some emerging market firms has been much higher than that for developed market firms. What best explains this difference in the speed of internationalization of these two types of firms?Group of answer choicesemerging market firms can not expand within their domestic marketsemerging market firms are relatively smaller and thus more agile and flexiblesome emerging market firms are motivated to catch-up with their developed market counterpartsemerging market firms don't have resources that are required for internationalization
When top Executives map the institutional context of any country they often explore one of the key questions: “How cumbersome are procedures for launching our new venture in emerging markets?”. Which of the following contexts is related to this question:Group of answer choicese. Political and Social Systemsd. Labour Marketsa. Capital Marketsc. Opennessb. Product Markets
What is one reason that impels some emerging market firms to pursue a springboard strategy?Group of answer choicesoffshore availability of technology and brandshome government support for going globalstrong presence of global rivals in their domestic marketsdesire to compete with the biggest and best corporations
It is challenging for multinational national enterprises (MNEs) to do business in emerging markets. Some MNEs decide to get into businesses that are not directly in their core line of business. For example, McDonald's while entering into the Russian market established its own trucking fleet and imported agriculture specialists to train farmers. Such a response by McDonald's can be classified as the followingGroup of answer choicesattempted to change contextwait for other competitors to enter marketreplicate business from home marketcompete alone in foreign emerging market
What Separates Emerging and MatureCapital Markets
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.