Rohit takes an old chair from the backyard of a seemingly abandoned house, thinking no one would care. Later, the owner of the house accuses Rohit of theft. Can Rohit be charged with theft?a) Yes, Rohit has committed theft because he took the chair without the owner's consent.b) No, Rohit has not committed theft because he thought the house was abandonedc) Yes, Rohit has committed theft irrespective of his belief about the house's status.d) No, Rohit has not committed theft as the chair was in an abandoned place.
Question
Rohit takes an old chair from the backyard of a seemingly abandoned house, thinking no one would care. Later, the owner of the house accuses Rohit of theft. Can Rohit be charged with theft?a) Yes, Rohit has committed theft because he took the chair without the owner's consent.b) No, Rohit has not committed theft because he thought the house was abandonedc) Yes, Rohit has committed theft irrespective of his belief about the house's status.d) No, Rohit has not committed theft as the chair was in an abandoned place.
Solution
a) Yes, Rohit has committed theft because he took the chair without the owner's consent.
Theft is defined as the act of taking someone else's property without their consent, with the intention to deprive the owner of it permanently. Even if Rohit believed the house was abandoned, it doesn't change the fact that he took the chair without seeking permission from the owner. Therefore, he can be charged with theft.
Similar Questions
Arun sees an unlocked bike in front of a shop and rides it home, thinking it was abandoned. The next day, the owner files a theft complaint. Can Arun be charged with theft?a) Yes, Arun has committed theft because he took the bike without the owner's consent.b) No, Arun has not committed theft because he thought the bike was abandoned.c) Yes, Arun has committed theft irrespective of his belief about the bike's status.d) No, Arun has not committed theft because he intended to find the owner later.
Ravi, during a quarrel with his friend Arjun, grabs Arjun's phone lying on a table and throws it out of the window, breaking it. Can Ravi be charged with theft?a) Yes, Ravi has committed theft because he took the phone without Arjun's consent.b) No, Ravi has not committed theft because he did not intend to keep the phone.c) Yes, Ravi has committed theft as he took and destroyed the phone without consent.d) No, Ravi has committed an act of vandalism, not theft.
Choose ‘Yes’ if the conclusion follows and ‘No’ if the conclusion does not follow.Stealing is punishable only if it results in getting caught. Stealing is not punishable when thieves are being careful. Stealing can sometimes result in being caught. Thieves are mostly careful, so they don't get caught.A) Stealing is unethical. 1. Yes
Stealing is punishable only if it results in getting caught. Stealing is not punishable when thieves are being careful. Stealing can sometimes result in being caught. Thieves are mostly careful, so they don't get caught.A) Stealing is unethical. 1. Yes 2. NoB) Stealing is punishable when thieves are being careful. 1. Yes 2. No
Choose ‘Yes’ if the conclusion follows and ‘No’ if the conclusion does not follow.Stealing is punishable only if it results in getting caught. Stealing is not punishable when thieves are being careful. Stealing can sometimes result in being caught. Thieves are mostly careful, so they don't get caught.A) Stealing is unethical. 1. Yes 2. NoB) Stealing is punishable when thieves are being careful. 1. Yes
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.