Which of the following is not relevant to proving any element which constitutes either actus reus or mens rea of larceny?The defendant takes the property without consent by the possessorThe defendant does not intend to return the property to the possessorThe defendant intends to take property that it is illegal for the possessor to possessThe defendant takes tangible property away from the possessor

The prosecution must establish that an individual charged with a criminal act had mens rea (intent).Group of answer choicesTrueFalse

If a statute imposes criminal liability based on strict liability, then "mens rea" is not required.Group of answer choicesTrueFalse

Neither shall rescission take place when the things which are the object of the contract are legally in the possession of third persons who did not act in

Right to property is1 pointA constitutional right onlyFundamental rightDirective principleB & C

The U.S. Constitution prohibits Ex Post Facto criminal laws. This means a defendant's act must have been prohibited by statute at the time he committed the act.Group of answer choicesTrueFalse