Knowee
Questions
Features
Study Tools

in public polcy planning, what counts isQuestion 6Answera.policy actorsb.the extent and details of the planningc.the quality of the planningd.Social research output

Question

in public polcy planning, what counts isQuestion 6Answera.policy actorsb.the extent and details of the planningc.the quality of the planningd.Social research output

🧐 Not the exact question you are looking for?Go ask a question

Solution

In public policy planning, all of the options mentioned are important.

a. Policy actors: These are the individuals or groups who have an interest or stake in the policy outcome. They can influence the policy process and its outcome.

b. The extent and details of the planning: This refers to how comprehensive the planning process is. It includes identifying the problem, setting objectives, considering alternatives, assessing the costs and benefits, implementing the policy, and evaluating the results.

c. The quality of the planning: This refers to how well the planning process is carried out. It includes the use of evidence-based decision making, stakeholder engagement, transparency, and accountability.

d. Social research output: This refers to the information and data gathered from social research that can inform the policy planning process. It can provide insights into the needs and preferences of the population, the effectiveness of current policies, and potential impacts of proposed policies.

Therefore, in public policy planning, what counts is not just one of these options, but a combination of all these factors.

This problem has been solved

Similar Questions

One of these is not a characteristics of Descriptive approach to the study of policy analyisisQuestion 5Answera.They are evaluatorb.Not concerned with investigation of policy contents or policy outputc.More of academic studies which are not geared towards the needs of policy actorsd.Seeking the understanding of policy process, policy problem and situations

In service of the broad aim of understanding the politics of public policy, thisbook pursues three interrelated goals.The first goal—tackled in Part I—is to spend some time thinking aboutthe normative foundations of policymaking. That is, to ask questions like,“What are the proper goals of public policy?” In so doing, we will discoverhow difficult it is to come up with a coherent, unified, normative frameworkto motivate policy decisions. We will arrive at one limited version of such aframework, but we will also see that the ambitious program of formulating abroad conceptualization of the public interest that everyone can endorse mightbe a fool’s errand. Nonetheless, along the way we will discover some usefuland provocative ideas that will make our thinking about these issues morestructured and nuanced.The second goal is to think through some fundamental aspects of social lifethat create opportunities for public policy to make the world a better place. Icall these aspects of social life—which are developed in Part II—social dilemmas.These social dilemmas are ubiquitous features of human interaction that giverise to predictably regrettable outcomes. We will discuss ways in which policymight improve those outcomes. The objective, in this part of the book, isto develop some habits of mind that let you see the world through a fewanalytical lenses. I believe you will find that once you get used to viewing theworld through the lens of these social dilemmas, you will start to see themeverywhere. This may be a bit depressing, but it is also useful in identifyingopportunities for policy to do good.The third goal is to think seriously and conceptually about the politics. AsI said in the preface, I’m not going to do this by analyzing the politics ofpolicymaking institution by institution. Instead, in Part III, we look at twoclasses of explanations for why governments might not always achieve goodpolicy outcomes. The first focuses on technological constraints—facts about the2 This argument is based on the discussion of the success of cap and trade in curbing sulphurdioxide emissions in Patashnik (2008, Chapter 8).Introduction 5policymaking process that limit the government’s ability to achieve good policyoutcomes even when policymakers are genuinely motivated to do so. Thesecond focuses on incentive constraints. Policymakers are people with their owninterests and concerns. We analyze how some fundamental facts of politics—most especially leaders’ desire to remain in power—interact with political in-stitutions to determine when policymakers have better or worse incentives topursue good policy. We end this part of the book by looking at a bit of evidenceon how the organization of government affects policy outcomes—including anextended discussion of foreign aid policy

As per the module, a significant characteristic of public policy is that it involves more than just the actions of government.  It also includes the behaviors or outcomes that government action creates. More importantly, policy can be made when the government is hesitant to act in ways that would change the status quo when circumstances or public opinion may have shifted on the matter. Group of answer choicesTrueFalse

The following are tasks done by an urban planner except one:a.Communication with the publicb.None of the abovec.Inspectionsd.Creation and interpretation of maps and diagramse.Coordination with government officials and politiciansf.Data analysis

Which of the following PR dimensions is mostly used when narrowly defining public affairs?Question 4Answera.Media relationsb.Government relationsc.Issues managementd.Community relations

1/2

Upgrade your grade with Knowee

Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.